Changes for page 2. Stakeholders
Last modified by William OGrady on 2024/04/08 16:04
From version 24.1
edited by William OGrady
on 2024/04/04 14:48
on 2024/04/04 14:48
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 19.1
edited by William OGrady
on 2024/03/25 15:17
on 2024/03/25 15:17
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,19 +1,19 @@ 1 -== //** Direct & IndirectStakeholders**// ==1 +== //**Stakeholders**// == 2 2 3 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HStakeholders" %) 4 4 Stakeholders encompass individuals, groups, or organisations engaged throughout the entirety of the Personal Encyclopedia's process. They can be categorised into two groups: Direct and Indirect. Direct stakeholders engage in immediate interaction with the robot, while Indirect stakeholders are ancillary or secondary participants in the process. 5 5 6 -**Who are the system's direct stakeholders?** 7 7 6 +**Direct stakeholders** 7 + 8 8 * Person with early-stage dementia. 9 9 * Direct relative(s) who help with the set-up of the robot. 10 10 * Programmers and designers of the robot. 11 11 12 -** Who are the system's indirect stakeholders?**12 +**Indirect stakeholders** 13 13 14 -* Indirectstakeholdersincludefurther friends and familywhoget feedback about the cognitive state and affect state of thePwD throughthesystem.15 -* OtherPwDwho have interacted withtheNAO/system, whoseuse providesfeedbackfor furtherdevelopment.16 -* Researchers affiliatedwiththestudyof dementiaandrelatedconditions.14 +* Other friends and family to get feedback about the cognitive state and affect state of the person with early-stage dementia and to add more context for future interactions. 15 +* People who have early-stage dementia who have interacted with Nao before and can provide feedback to keep improving the concept. These people are considered to be indirect stakeholders, because they do not interact with Nao to fulfil their role as evaluator. Of course, they have, in the past, interacted with the robot. 16 +* Researchers interested in the disease progression who are interested in the data. 17 17 18 18 == //**Values**// == 19 19 ... ... @@ -35,8 +35,8 @@ 35 35 The goal is to avoid total dependence on NAO and ensure that during the initial three phases (Set-up, Accustoming, and Operational), the PwD does not become dependent. To safeguard against this, the fourth phase has been devised to expand NAO's capabilities. For instance, NAO will be capable of quizzing the PwD rather than solely receiving questions. In this manner, we can mitigate any potential adverse effects of utilising this system. 36 36 37 37 38 -**Programmers and designers value PwDs' trust in the Robot:**38 +**Programmers and designers value PwDs' trust in the System:** 39 39 40 -For direct stakeholders, including PwD and their relatives, programmers and designers must ensure the robot operates effectively and positively impacts the PwD. Aligning with the previously mentioned values, the combination of functionality and value is essential to cultivate a successful system, thereby developing a level of reliability and trust among all direct and indirect stakeholders.40 +For direct stakeholders, including PwD and their relatives, programmers and designers must ensure the system operates effectively and positively impacts the PwD. Aligning with the previously mentioned values, the combination of functionality and value is essential to cultivate a successful system, thereby developing a level of reliability and trust among all direct and indirect stakeholders. 41 41 42 42