Changes for page 2. Socio-Cognitive Engineering

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -1,15 +1,25 @@
	1	+**Questions to answer here:**
	2	+
1	1	* Why do we use Socio-Cognitive Engineering? What are its aspect/perks and why is that applicable in our case?
	4	+* "How can the technology be designed such that the human is able to work with the technology?" - xwiki
2	2
3		-"How can the technology be designed such that the human is able to work with the technology?" - xwiki
	6	+**Short answer:**
4	4
5		-**SCE**
	8	+We need an agent that takes care of some of the needs of Pwds. We cannot see these people outside of their environment and have to integrate that into our solution. so we need sce.
6	6
7	7	AI does not work in isolation. We have to integrate technology into human's work and living environment. Source: Week 3.1a slide 27. This Hybrid intelligence is situated (source slide 28). It's a combination of the agent, the human, and their environment, each of which practice self-regulation.
8	8
	12	+"Identifying the underlying motivation for an individual with dementia to engage in different activities is important for matching a person with activities that will be satisfying." (Han, A., Radel, J., McDowd, J. M., & Sabata, D. (2016). Perspectives of people with dementia about meaningful activities: a synthesis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 31(2), 115-123) So we need SCE to identify these motivations and stuff.
	13	+
	14	+
	15	+**More explanation:**
	16	+
	17	+//SCE//
	18	+
9	9	* It provides a structure to work in (see the foundation, specification, evaluation image).
10	10	* It considers multiple stakeholders and their values.
11	11	* It uses user stories and value stories.
12		-* It is incremental and iterative.
	22	+* It is incremental and iterative. (**Cyclic Process of Progression: **Source: after Carroll (2002), Figure 3.1, p. 68.)
13	13	* It uses ontologies and design patterns.
14	14	* It uses personas and problem scenarios, and scenario-based design.
15	15	* It uses use cases, functions, effects, and claims in the specification
...	...	@@ -23,60 +23,38 @@
23	23	** Stakeholder involvement in design and test activities
24	24	** Producing re-usable design specifications and implementations
25	25
26		-**HYBRID INTELLIGENCE GROWS BY...**
27		-Integrating technology into the situated practice via co-design by joint task performance and co-learning:
28	28
29		-* Common situated objectives
30		-* Value-sensitive agreements
31		-* Shared knowledge base & experiences
32		-* Mutual uptake & learning by explanation & feedback
	37	+//HYBRID INTELLIGENCE GROWS BY...//
33	33
34		-and is grounded by
	39	+* Integrating technology into the situated practice via co-design by joint task performance and co-learning:
	40	+** Common situated objectives
	41	+** Value-sensitive agreements
	42	+** Shared knowledge base & experiences
	43	+** Mutual uptake & learning by explanation & feedback
	44	+* and is grounded by
	45	+** Ontologies of the partnership
	46	+** Collaboration patterns
	47	+** Value models
35	35
36		-* Ontologies of the partnership
37		-* Collaboration patterns
38		-* Value models
39	39
40	40
41		-We need an agent that takes care of some of the needs of Pwds. We cannot see these people outside of their environment and have to integrate that into our solution. so we need sce.
	51	+//What is Human Centred design?//
42	42
	53	+* **Usability**
	54	+** extent to which a system, product or service can be used by specified users to achieve specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction in a specified context of use
	55	+* **Effectiveness**
	56	+** accuracy and completeness with which users achieve specified goals
	57	+* **Efficiency**
	58	+** resources expended in relation to the accuracy and completeness with which users achieve goals
	59	+* **Satisfaction**
	60	+** freedom from discomfort and positive attitudes towards the use of the product
	61	+* **Context of use**
	62	+** users, tasks, equipment (hardware, software and materials), and the physical and social environments in which a product is used
	63	+* **User experience**
	64	+** person's perceptions and responses resulting from the use and/or anticipated use of a product, system or service
	65	+* **Stakeholder**
	66	+** individual or organization having a right, share, claim or interest in a system or in its possession of characteristics that meet their needs and expectations
43	43
44		-"Identifying the underlying motivation for an individual with dementia to engage in different activities is important for matching a person with activities that will be satisfying.". So we need SCE to identify these motivations and stuff.
45	45
46		-Han, A., Radel, J., McDowd, J. M., & Sabata, D. (2016). Perspectives of people with dementia about meaningful activities: a synthesis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 31(2), 115-123
47	47
48		-
49		-What is Human Centred design?
50		-
51		-**Usability**
52		-extent to which a system, product or service can
53		-be used by specified users to achieve specified
54		-goals with effectiveness, efficiency and
55		-satisfaction in a specified context of use
56		-**Effectiveness**
57		-accuracy and completeness with which users
58		-achieve specified goals
59		-**Efficiency**
60		-resources expended in relation to the accuracy
61		-and completeness with which users achieve
62		-goals
63		-**Satisfaction**
64		-freedom from discomfort and positive attitudes
65		-towards the use of the product
66		-**Context of use**
67		-users, tasks, equipment (hardware, software and
68		-materials), and the physical and social
69		-environments in which a product is used
70		-**User experience**
71		-person's perceptions and responses resulting from
72		-the use and/or anticipated use of a product, system
73		-or service
74		-**Stakeholder**
75		-individual or organization having a right, share,
76		-claim or interest in a system or in its possession of
77		-characteristics that meet their needs and
78		-expectations
79		-
80		-
81		-
82		-**Cyclic Process of Progression: **Source: after Carroll (2002), Figure 3.1, p. 68.
	70	+