Skip to Content
Last modified by Rixt Hellinga on 2024/04/08 18:40
From version 4.8
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/02/29 09:02
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 14.2
edited by Mark Neerincx
on 2024/03/18 15:53
Change comment: Added comment

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -xwiki:XWiki.RixtHellinga
1 +xwiki:XWiki.MarkNeerincx
Content
... ... @@ -1,82 +1,11 @@
1 -* Why do we use Socio-Cognitive Engineering? What are its aspect/perks and why is that applicable in our case?
1 +The issue at hand, as discussed in previous chapters, requires a combination of human and robot solutions. To design and develop such a solution we can use the Socio-Cognitive Engineering (SCE) method. SCE provides a clear structure, consisting of a foundation, specification, and evaluation. It allows us to take into account stakeholders and their values, and create claims through functions, effects, and use cases. The incremental and iterative process taken in the SCE method combines human factors and related technology to form re-usable solutions.
2 2  
3 -"How can the technology be designed such that the human is able to work with the technology?" - xwiki
3 +Generally, technology does not work in isolation [1]. In the context of our problem, the robot's environment, knowledge, and goals are intertwined with that of the human. SCE allows us to combine the human and technological aspects or our problem. According to [2] it is important to map the underlying motivation of parties in order to understand which activities they would be drawn to. Each of the involved parties (the robot, the subject, the guardian) can be modeled through the SCE method. Through methods such as user stories and value stories we can create a well-rounded description of a stakeholder and their goals. The difference in for example environments, abilities, and goals are easy to map out through SCE.
4 4  
5 -**SCE**
5 += **//References//** =
6 6  
7 -AI does not work in isolation. We have to integrate technology into human's work and living environment. Source: Week 3.1a slide 27. This Hybrid intelligence is situated (source slide 28). It's a combination of the agent, the human, and their environment, each of which practice self-regulation.
7 +[1] Week 3.1a slide 27.
8 8  
9 -* It provides a structure to work in (see the foundation, specification, evaluation image).
10 -* It considers multiple stakeholders and their values.
11 -* It uses user stories and value stories.
12 -* It is incremental and iterative.
13 -* It uses ontologies and design patterns.
14 -* It uses personas and problem scenarios, and scenario-based design.
15 -* It uses use cases, functions, effects, and claims in the specification
16 -* It is: (source Week 3.2b - SCEmodule2b_ScenarioBasedDesign2024 slide 4)
17 -** Iterative incremental process
18 -*** Quick start
19 -*** Focused refinement of core functions and design rationale
20 -*** Coherent specification
21 -** Theory and empirical driven
22 -** Combined operational (domain), human factors and technology perspective
23 -** Stakeholder involvement in design and test activities
24 -** Producing re-usable design specifications and implementations
9 +[2] Han, A., Radel, J., McDowd, J. M., & Sabata, D. (2016). Perspectives of people with dementia about meaningful activities: a synthesis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 31(2), 115-123)
25 25  
26 -**HYBRID INTELLIGENCE GROWS BY...**
27 -Integrating technology into the situated practice via co-design by joint task performance and co-learning:
28 -
29 -* Common situated objectives
30 -* Value-sensitive agreements
31 -* Shared knowledge base & experiences
32 -* Mutual uptake & learning by explanation & feedback
33 -
34 -and is grounded by
35 -
36 -* Ontologies of the partnership
37 -* Collaboration patterns
38 -* Value models
39 -
40 -
41 -We need an agent that takes care of some of the needs of Pwds. We cannot see these people outside of their environment and have to integrate that into our solution. so we need sce.
42 -
43 -
44 -"Identifying the underlying motivation for an individual with dementia to engage in different activities is important for matching a person with activities that will be satisfying.". So we need SCE to identify these motivations and stuff.
45 -
46 -Han, A., Radel, J., McDowd, J. M., & Sabata, D. (2016). Perspectives of people with dementia about meaningful activities: a synthesis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 31(2), 115-123
47 -
48 -
49 -What is Human Centred design?
50 -
51 -**Usability**
52 -extent to which a system, product or service can
53 -be used by specified users to achieve specified
54 -goals with effectiveness, efficiency and
55 -satisfaction in a specified context of use
56 -**Effectiveness**
57 -accuracy and completeness with which users
58 -achieve specified goals
59 -**Efficiency**
60 -resources expended in relation to the accuracy
61 -and completeness with which users achieve
62 -goals
63 -**Satisfaction**
64 -freedom from discomfort and positive attitudes
65 -towards the use of the product
66 -**Context of use**
67 -users, tasks, equipment (hardware, software and
68 -materials), and the physical and social
69 -environments in which a product is used
70 -**User experience**
71 -person's perceptions and responses resulting from
72 -the use and/or anticipated use of a product, system
73 -or service
74 -**Stakeholder**
75 -individual or organization having a right, share,
76 -claim or interest in a system or in its possession of
77 -characteristics that meet their needs and
78 -expectations
79 -
80 -
81 -
82 -**Cyclic Process of Progression: **Source: after Carroll (2002), Figure 3.1, p. 68.
11 +
XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +xwiki:XWiki.MarkNeerincx
Comment
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Maybe you can add something on the integration of disciplines and distributed R&D activities?
Date
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2024-03-18 15:53:47.866