Changes for page F00.0: System Setup
Last modified by Pravesha Ramsundersingh on 2024/04/08 10:42
From version 16.1
edited by Pravesha Ramsundersingh
on 2024/04/08 10:42
on 2024/04/08 10:42
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 2.1
edited by William OGrady
on 2024/03/11 14:36
on 2024/03/11 14:36
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (3 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
-
Attachments (0 modified, 0 added, 2 removed)
-
Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 2 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -F0 0.0:SystemSetup1 +FN01.0 Function 1 - Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -xwiki:XWiki. PraveshaRamsundersingh1 +xwiki:XWiki.WilliamOGrady - Content
-
... ... @@ -1,32 +1,11 @@ 1 -|((( 2 -=== Function 1 === 3 - 4 -**Guardian supplies NAO with basic information.** 5 - 6 -1. Programmer/Designer sets a list of questions for the Guardian to complete on behalf of the PwD 7 -1. Guardian receives the online survey 8 -1. Guardian enters the information in the online survey 9 -1. Information is stored in NAO's database 10 - 11 - 12 -[[image:Screenshot 2024-04-08 at 10.41.21.png]] 13 - 14 -=== Function 2 === 15 - 16 -**NAO asks questions to Guardian and PwD.** 17 - 18 -1. NAO has identified knowledge gaps in the database to ask about 19 -1. NAO poses these questions to the Guardian and PwD 20 -1. NAO waits for verbal response from either Guardian or PwD 21 -1. Guardian or PwD responds with the question 22 -1. NAO simultaneously stores information under the relevant question heading within the database 23 -1. NAO repeats from step 1 until no new information is shared by the PwD and the Guardian 24 -1. NAO proceeds to prompt for any future social interactions with discussed relatives 25 -1. Guardian and PwD can set parameters and alerts for visiting relatives 26 - 27 - 28 -[[image:Screenshot 2024-04-08 at 10.42.07.png]] 29 - 30 - 31 -)))| 32 -|(% colspan="1" %) |(% colspan="1" %) 1 +|**Specification**|((( 2 +* A 3 +* B 4 +* C 5 +* D 6 +* E 7 +))) 8 +|(% colspan="1" %)**Use cases**|(% colspan="1" %)((( 9 +* A 10 +* B 11 +)))
- Screenshot 2024-04-08 at 10.41.21.png
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -xwiki:XWiki.PraveshaRamsundersingh - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -122.1 KB - Content
- Screenshot 2024-04-08 at 10.42.07.png
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -xwiki:XWiki.PraveshaRamsundersingh - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -133.2 KB - Content
- XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
-
- Date
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2024-04-01 15:46:53.816 - Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -xwiki:XWiki.DiederikHeijbroek - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Would it be better for function 2 part 1 to ask open questions about whether information is still missing? Otherwise we could have added these questions in the questionnaire. Example: NAO asks whether the information is complete. Guardian and PwD come up with information that can be something we have not yet thought about. I think it is very probable that the Guardian and PwD themselves know what information is useful to include in the library after the first questionnaire has been filled in.
- XWiki.XWikiComments[1]
-
- Date
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2024-04-01 15:56:50.251 - Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -xwiki:XWiki.RixtHellinga - Reply To
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -0 - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,2 +1,0 @@ 1 -I think you're right; Given a conversational model, we do not need specific questions to provide to the NAO. Instead, we should give it a goal (eg. Learn about their relatives), and then let the conversational model work by itself. 2 -\\~-~-~-~- RESOLVED