Project homeTim - Self Reflection
At the start of my Self Reflection I want to mention that I joined the team late in week 3. I want to thank the team that they took me and helped me get up to speed fast.
Week 1: Introduction to Socio-Cognitive Engineering
In this week I learned about the project by going through the lectures slides, the papers and discovered the Brightspace page.
The lecture started with an introduction to the course with an introduction to the team and an explanation on how the course was set up. After that Human Centered Design was explained together with the standards. Than, the ReJam and PAL project were presented. The ReJam project was a project for people with Dementia in Pieter van Foorest where music was used to stimulate group activities.
The Lab Session slides together with the XWiki learned me what I should think about for the Quick Start menu and which Robots are available.
Week 2: Dementia, Memory and Music as an Intervention
From the lecture slides I learned that age is an important factor for changes in cognitive abilities. Also, your lifestyle can have a huge effect. This can be explained by the term 'cognitive reserve'. This essentially means that with good life choices (much exercise for mind and body, healthy food etc.), the brain is more resistant to illness. When a person does get ill, for example with dementia, music can help with regulating mood and emotions.
The second lecture talks about the Socio-Cognitive Engineering Method. The inclusive design also gets explained by what it should address. After that, the stakeholder gets explained which can be direct but also indirect. Lastly, scenarios were discussed. Why they are important and how they should be constructed.
Week 3: PAL
This week I joined the team and they brought me up to speed. I was introduced to the subject and how it would improve lives of people with dementia.
In this week's lecture, I learned about how the PAL project used the SCE design cycle to build a diabetes management robot for children with Type 1 diabetes. The lecture emphasized the significance of stakeholder analysis and building value stories to inform our design, which we applied in finalizing our personas, stakeholders, environment, design, and problem scenario for the project presentation in Week 4.
Week 4: First Presentation
This week we had the first presentation which are teammates gave. We worked together on the slides and did a test-presentation after which I gave feedback. In this first presentation we talked about our problem scenario, personas, stakeholders and presented our solution. I think the presentation went well and our story was clear.
Week 5: Design Specifications
During the lecture, topic of emotional expression in robotics was discussed. Specifically, we learned about how robots can convey emotions through their eye color and body language. Next, we discussed the importance of evaluation in the design and development of the robot. We learned about different evaluation methods and how they can be used to measure the effectiveness and effectiveness of a robot. Wewe also learned the ethical considerations that must be taken into account when designing and implementing robots. It was emphasized that informed consent must be obtained from all users, and that robots should be designed to respect the privacy and autonomy of individuals. We also briefly touched on the topic of ontologies, which are important for defining and categorizing knowledge in robotics.
Overall, the lecture provided a comprehensive overview of the many different aspects involved in designing and developing robots. It highlighted the importance of considering not only the technical aspects of robotics, but also the emotional and ethical dimensions that are crucial for creating robots that are effective, user-friendly, and respectful of human values and rights.
Week 6: Implementation and Initial Testings
Week 7: Evaluation
Week 8: Final Presentation
At the start of this week, on Monday, we had our final presentation. We worked on the slides and discussed what was important to include and also what could be left out. A test-presentation in our own group was done to make sure everything we told was clear.
In our presentation we first had a quick recap of our problem scenario, than an explanation of our design and theories to support it. After that, I showed a video of our experiment and presented our evaluation and results. We received feedback on our statistical analysis and choice of questionnaire.
Week 9: The Finishing Touch
This week was the deadline for our XWiki on Tuesday. Of course, most work was done, but we went through everything and improved parts that were unclear. Finally, we handed in the XWiki and the project came to an end. I want to thank my team for all the hard work and I am very happy with the final result! Also, I want to thank Mark and the whole Socio-Engineering team for teaching us this course.