Wiki source code of Cesar van der Poel
Last modified by Cesar van der Poel on 2022/04/05 08:53
Show last authors
author | version | line-number | content |
---|---|---|---|
1 | **Week 1** | ||
2 | I was unable to attend the first lecture, leaving me to miss some relatively important information. During the second lecture of the week, I met two others who at that point would belong to my group (one of which dropped out later that week). The three of us were able to generate an initial idea for the problem to solve, however, and this idea developed into the version currently present on this wiki. I spent most of the time this week figuring out what the idea behind the course was and getting in touch with other members of my group. | ||
3 | |||
4 | **Week 2** | ||
5 | In the second week, our group divided the first basic tasks of the project and made a basic planning. We also elaborated on what exactly we wanted the subject and scope of our project to be. All of us worked together on the operational demands, some people taking more of a focus on one specific page while others took up some other tasks such as summarising the monday lecture. I personally mainly focused the problem scenario, but also did some work on the use cases. | ||
6 | |||
7 | **Week 3** | ||
8 | During this week we used the lecture to elaborate the personas. Before this point we had basic personalities, but after the lecture they were complete. We also divided the tasks, and I worked together with Xin on the design patterns (both the TDP and the IDPs). | ||
9 | |||
10 | **Week 4** | ||
11 | With only one week to go it was time for Xin, Clara and me to prepare the presentation. We made a structure for it, divided the slides among the three of us and did a practice run once they were done. Next to the presentation we also worked together on the specification; all of us tried to think of some requirements and claims. I personally did some work on the objectives while others had a look at the evaluation. We also did some research into interactive robotics but came to the conclusion that this would not satisfy our needs for programming the robot. This is also the week that our system got its name SALLe (Stay A Little Longer - Elderly edition) after it beat the competing options PWR (Prevent Wandering Robot) and WADE (Wandering Averter for Dementing Elderly). | ||
12 | |||
13 | **Week 5** | ||
14 | After doing the presentation, we started processing the feedback we got on both the presentation and the wiki. Of course, the presentations took over a timeslot in which we normally could have had a meeting, but we made up for this by creating a flowchart of the intended behaviour over zoom. This is also the week we installed and looked at Choregraphe to make sure we could program Pepper. | ||
15 | |||
16 | **Week 6** | ||
17 | This was the first week we worked with Pepper. Setting up the initial version did not go flawlessly, but after some debugging it worked. During a later session I was unfortunately unable to attend this version was improved further. All of us also had a further look at what pages still needed more work and worked on progressing those. | ||
18 | |||
19 | **Week 7** | ||
20 | This week was almost fully focussed on Pepper. On tuesday we finished the code, and we used wednesday and thursday to do the evaluations. The results we got were analysed and we all took up the perfection of a page or set of pages - something we continued doing in the next week. | ||
21 | |||
22 | **Week 8** | ||
23 | After the second presentation, it was time to finalize the xWiki. I personally worked on perfecting the Specification section and had a look at the other pages to see if I would change anything and if they were still correct. We handed in the project on the next tuesday. |