Changes for page Claims

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -26,9 +26,13 @@
26	26	Movement is an essential part of interacting, so if the robot is able to detect the lack of movement mid conversation, it can deduce that the patient is unresponsive.
27	27
28	28	== General claims ==
	29	+The following claims do not dirrectly correspond to a single use case, but instead the use cases each contribute, to some degree, to these claims.
	30	+
29	29	CL011: Patient's health improves.
	32	+By exercising regularly and talking with the robot, both physical and mental health are expected to improve.
30	30
31	31	CL012: Patient is happy to interact with the robot.
	35	+It is crucial that the user experience is positive in quality, to ensure that the patient doesn't view using the robot as a chore, as this might negatively impact their health.
32	32
33	33	== Tested claims ==
34	34	The following claims are derived based on the basic ones for the quiz use case, and are the ones targeted in the evaluation.
...	...	@@ -37,12 +37,5 @@
37	37	The main objective of the robot is to make and reinforce the connection between music and task, so that the reminders would be gentler, in the form of a music fragment, rathern that directly reminding the patients wath to do.
38	38
39	39	CL102: By practicing with the NAO, the connection between activity and music gets stronger over time.
	44	+It is assumed that practice with the robot (mainly through the quiz) can help the patient make the connection between music and activity stronger, and eventually create a reflex.
40	40
41		-
42		-**TODO:**
43		-Can have analysis on the pros and cons that may happen with each stakeholder
44		-Maybe change claims into these? Need more
45		-The patient recalls what to do after hearing certain music
46		-The patient memorizes the activities better through quizzes.
47		-The patient becomes physically healthier.
48		-The patient is happy with using the robot.