Changes for page Claims
Last modified by Andrei Stefan on 2022/04/04 12:14
From version 
12.1
12.1
edited by Andrei Stefan
on 2022/04/04 12:14
on 2022/04/04 12:14
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
-
Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki. AndreiStefan1 +xwiki:XWiki.BartVastenhouw - Content
-
... ... @@ -1,45 +1,0 @@ 1 -== Basic claims == 2 -The following claims are based on the use cases. 3 - 4 -**CL001: The patient can associate music they hear with activities they need to do.** 5 -Given enough practice, the patient should be able to make a connection between the music and the tasks. 6 - 7 -**CL002: The user can tell if the robot knows they completed the task.** 8 -It is good to include some confirmation from the robot, so that the patients know that the robot knows that they are donw with the task and is not stuck waiting for a reply. 9 - 10 -**CL003: It is easier to contact the caregiver.** 11 -It is also possible to just include the caregiver's contact information when setting up the robot. 12 - 13 -**CL004: Customizable settings make it easier for the patient to remember the correct activity.** 14 -By allowing the users to pick music that they like or that they feel fits well with an activity, it should be easier for them to remember the connection. 15 - 16 -**CL005: Seeing the robot move along when exercising motivates the patient to keep exercising.** 17 -Having a partner to exercise with is a good motivator to keep exercising. Could also link with **RQ008: The robot can detect movements**, to correct the user on their posture. 18 - 19 -**CL006: Data helps design better exercise routines.** 20 -By keeping track of exercise sessions and the patient's status during them, it is possible to optimize the workout program and fit it better to the user. 21 - 22 -**CL007: Analysis can point out other health issues, if any.** 23 -By looking at physical activity data over time, it is possible to spot patterns which point to physical ailments. 24 - 25 -**CL008: It is possible to detect unresponsive patients.** 26 -Movement is an essential part of interacting, so if the robot is able to detect the lack of movement mid conversation, it can deduce that the patient is unresponsive. 27 - 28 -== General claims == 29 -The following claims do not dirrectly correspond to a single use case, but instead the use cases each contribute, to some degree, to these claims. 30 - 31 -**CL011: Patient's health improves.** 32 -By exercising regularly and talking with the robot, both physical and mental health are expected to improve. 33 - 34 -**CL012: Patient is happy to interact with the robot.** 35 -It is crucial that the user experience is positive in quality, to ensure that the patient doesn't view using the robot as a chore, as this might negatively impact their health. 36 - 37 -== Tested claims == 38 -The following claims are derived based on the basic ones for the quiz use case, and are the ones targeted in the evaluation. 39 - 40 -**CL101: People with dementia remember their tasks easier if they are associated with a piece of music. ** 41 -The main objective of the robot is to make and reinforce the connection between music and task, so that the reminders would be gentler, in the form of a music fragment, rathern that directly reminding the patients wath to do. 42 - 43 -**CL102: By practicing with the NAO, the connection between activity and music gets stronger over time.** 44 -It is assumed that practice with the robot (mainly through the quiz) can help the patient make the connection between music and activity stronger, and eventually create a reflex. 45 -
-
XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
-
- Date
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2022-03-21 19:52:04.375 - Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anonymous - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Do not mix up claims with objectives. Claims are testable, more concrete/detail/focused. You may want to mention it. The claims that you are going to test in your evaluation, should refer to concrete measures.