Skip to Content

Changes for page Claims

Last modified by Andrei Stefan on 2022/04/04 12:14
From version Icon 11.1 Icon
edited by Andrei Stefan
on 2022/04/04 12:13
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 1.1 Icon
edited by Bart Vastenhouw
on 2022/02/07 21:52
Change comment: Imported from XAR

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.AndreiStefan
1 +xwiki:XWiki.BartVastenhouw
Content
... ... @@ -1,45 +1,0 @@
1 -== Basic claims ==
2 -The following claims are based on the use cases.
3 -
4 -**CL001: The patient can associate music they hear with activities they need to do.**
5 -Given enough practice, the patient should be able to make a connection between the music and the tasks.
6 -
7 -CL002: The user can tell if the robot knows they completed the task.
8 -It is good to include some confirmation from the robot, so that the patients know that the robot knows that they are donw with the task and is not stuck waiting for a reply.
9 -
10 -CL003: It is easier to contact the caregiver.
11 -It is also possible to just include the caregiver's contact information when setting up the robot.
12 -
13 -CL004: Customizable settings make it easier for the patient to remember the correct activity.
14 -By allowing the users to pick music that they like or that they feel fits well with an activity, it should be easier for them to remember the connection.
15 -
16 -CL005: Seeing the robot move along when exercising motivates the patient to keep exercising.
17 -Having a partner to exercise with is a good motivator to keep exercising. Could also link with RQ008: The robot can detect movements, to correct the user on their posture.
18 -
19 -CL006: Data helps design better exercise routines.
20 -By keeping track of exercise sessions and the patient's status during them, it is possible to optimize the workout program and fit it better to the user.
21 -
22 -CL007: Analysis can point out other health issues, if any.
23 -By looking at physical activity data over time, it is possible to spot patterns which point to physical ailments.
24 -
25 -CL008: It is possible to detect unresponsive patients.
26 -Movement is an essential part of interacting, so if the robot is able to detect the lack of movement mid conversation, it can deduce that the patient is unresponsive.
27 -
28 -== General claims ==
29 -The following claims do not dirrectly correspond to a single use case, but instead the use cases each contribute, to some degree, to these claims.
30 -
31 -CL011: Patient's health improves.
32 -By exercising regularly and talking with the robot, both physical and mental health are expected to improve.
33 -
34 -CL012: Patient is happy to interact with the robot.
35 -It is crucial that the user experience is positive in quality, to ensure that the patient doesn't view using the robot as a chore, as this might negatively impact their health.
36 -
37 -== Tested claims ==
38 -The following claims are derived based on the basic ones for the quiz use case, and are the ones targeted in the evaluation.
39 -
40 -CL101: People with dementia remember their tasks easier if they are associated with a piece of music.
41 -The main objective of the robot is to make and reinforce the connection between music and task, so that the reminders would be gentler, in the form of a music fragment, rathern that directly reminding the patients wath to do.
42 -
43 -CL102: By practicing with the NAO, the connection between activity and music gets stronger over time.
44 -It is assumed that practice with the robot (mainly through the quiz) can help the patient make the connection between music and activity stronger, and eventually create a reflex.
45 -
Icon XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Anonymous
Comment
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Do not mix up claims with objectives. Claims are testable, more concrete/detail/focused. You may want to mention it. The claims that you are going to test in your evaluation, should refer to concrete measures.
Date
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2022-03-21 19:52:04.375