Changes for page Claims

Last modified by Andrei Stefan on 2022/04/04 12:14

From version 1.1 Icon
edited by Bart Vastenhouw
on 2022/02/07 21:52
Change comment: Imported from XAR
To version Icon 9.3 Icon
edited by Andrei Stefan
on 2022/04/03 17:20
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -xwiki:XWiki.BartVastenhouw
1 +XWiki.AndreiStefan
Content
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,50 @@
1 +== Basic claims ==
2 +The following claims are based on the use cases.
3 +
4 +CL001: The patient can associate music they hear with activities they need to do.
5 +Given enough practice, the patient should be able to make a connection between the music and the tasks.
6 +
7 +CL002: The user can tell if the robot knows they completed the task.
8 +It is good to include some confirmation from the robot, so that the patients know that the robot knows that they are donw with the task and is not stuck waiting for a reply.
9 +
10 +CL003: It is easier to contact the caregiver.
11 +It is also possible to just include the caregiver's contact information when setting up the robot.
12 +
13 +CL004: Customizable settings make it easier for the patient to remember the correct activity.
14 +By allowing the users to pick music that they like or that they feel fits well with an activity, it should be easier for them to remember the connection.
15 +
16 +CL005: Seeing the robot move along when exercising motivates the patient to keep exercising.
17 +Having a partner to exercise with is a good motivator to keep exercising. Could also link with RQ008: The robot can detect movements, to correct the user on their posture.
18 +
19 +CL006: Data helps design better exercise routines.
20 +By keeping track of exercise sessions and the patient's status during them, it is possible to optimize the workout program and fit it better to the user.
21 +
22 +CL007: Analysis can point out other health issues, if any.
23 +By looking at physical activity data over time, it is possible to spot patterns which point to physical ailments.
24 +
25 +CL008: It is possible to detect unresponsive patients.
26 +Movement is an essential part of interacting, so if the robot is able to detect the lack of movement mid conversation, it can deduce that the patient is unresponsive.
27 +
28 +== General claims ==
29 +CL011: Patient's health improves.
30 +By exercising regularly and talking with the robot, both physical and mental health are expected to improve.
31 +
32 +CL012: Patient is happy to interact with the robot.
33 +It is crucial that the user experience is positive in quality, to ensure that the patient doesn't view using the robot as a chore, as this might negatively impact their health.
34 +
35 +== Tested claims ==
36 +The following claims are derived based on the basic ones for the quiz use case, and are the ones targeted in the evaluation.
37 +
38 +CL101: People with dementia remember their tasks easier if they are associated with a piece of music.
39 +The main objective of the robot is to make and reinforce the connection between music and task, so that the reminders would be gentler, in the form of a music fragment, rathern that directly reminding the patients wath to do.
40 +
41 +CL102: By practicing with the NAO, the connection between activity and music gets stronger over time.
42 +
43 +
44 +**TODO:**
45 +Can have analysis on the pros and cons that may happen with each stakeholder
46 +Maybe change claims into these? Need more
47 +The patient recalls what to do after hearing certain music
48 +The patient memorizes the activities better through quizzes.
49 +The patient becomes physically healthier.
50 +The patient is happy with using the robot.
Icon XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Anonymous
Comment
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Do not mix up claims with objectives. Claims are testable, more concrete/detail/focused. You may want to mention it. The claims that you are going to test in your evaluation, should refer to concrete measures.
Date
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2022-03-21 19:52:04.375