Skip to Content

Changes for page Test

Last modified by Sofia Kostakonti on 2022/04/05 14:08
From version Icon 94.1 Icon
edited by Marlein Vogels
on 2022/04/03 20:24
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 95.1 Icon
edited by Marlein Vogels
on 2022/04/03 20:25
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -227,6 +227,7 @@
227 227  * “Efficient interaction, but less friendly than the other interaction.”
228 228  * “Strange, I did not catch the questions.”
229 229  * “It felt short.”
230 +
230 230  Some of these quotes stress the fact that the less intelligent prototype interaction was rather short and direct. It should be said that the sequence of the interactions seemed to have some impact on how the participants experienced the interaction. Some participants who first experienced the less intelligent prototype were smiling and positively surprised during this interaction, while others who first experienced the intelligent prototype were over all smiling less while interacting with the less intelligent robot.
231 231  
232 232  From the interaction with the intelligent version of the robot, some interesting quotes were:
... ... @@ -236,6 +236,7 @@
236 236  * “Suggestion to eat was still a bit on the side, a little subtle if I would have dementia.”
237 237  * “Very nice, calming, I could have stayed longer with the music.”
238 238  * “It was good, natural, understands what I’m saying.”
240 +
239 239  Some participants clearly expressed how friendly they found the intelligent version of the robot. The sequence of the interactions did not seem to impact their feeling about the interaction as much as with the interaction with the less intelligent version of the robot.
240 240  Some reported that the interaction felt natural and intuitive.
241 241  As for the music, some participants told us that the music did was a useful and pleasant addition to the interaction with the robot.