Project home1. Social Robot
Choosing the NAO
The selection of NAO for assisting PwDs is particularly strategic due to its unique features. NAO's humanoid design and customizable interactions enable it to present a familiar and comforting presence, which can significantly aid its user in recalling past memories, relationships, and occupations. Its advanced communication capabilities allow NAO to engage its user in meaningful conversations, effectively reminding them of their personal history and maintaining their cognitive functions. Moreover, NAO's proven track record in therapeutic settings ensures safety and accessibility, making it an ideal companion for PwDs as they navigate the challenges of dementia. This focused approach on memory stimulation and personal history is crucial for enhancing the quality of life of the PwD.
Criteria | NAO | MiRo-E | Pepper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | Humanoid, more relatable | Animal-like, less human-relatable | Humanoid but less expressive |
| Customizability | Highly customizable interactions | Limited compared to humanoid robots | Less customizable than NAO |
| Communication Capabilities | Advanced: natural language processing, speech recognition | Basic compared to NAO | Advanced but less focused on personal interaction |
| R&D Support | Strong community, continuous improvements | Emerging, less established | Supported but less healthcare-focused |
| Track Record | Proven in educational and therapeutic settings | Less proven in diverse settings | Used in customer service, less in therapy |
| Safety and Accessibility | Designed with safety, accessible size and mobility | Safe but less interactive for cognitive tasks | Safe but larger and less accessible |