1. Social Robot

Last modified by William OGrady on 2024/04/06 11:43

Choosing the NAO

The selection of the NAO robot for assisting PwDs is particularly strategic due to its unique features. NAO's humanoid design and customizable interactions enable it to present a familiar and comforting presence, which can significantly aid its user in recalling past memories, relationships, and endeavors. Its advanced communication capabilities allow NAO to engage its user in meaningful conversations, effectively reminding them of their personal history and maintaining their cognitive functions. Moreover, NAO's proven track record in therapeutic settings ensures safety and accessibility for sensitive subjects such as children or the elderly [1], making it an ideal companion for PwDs as they navigate the challenges of dementia. This focused approach on memory stimulation and personal history is crucial for enhancing the quality of life of the PwD.

Criteria

NAOMiRo-EPepper
Design

Humanoid, more relatable

Animal-like, less human-relatableHumanoid but less expressive
Customizability

Highly customizable interactions

Limited compared to humanoid robotsLess customizable than NAO
Communication Capabilities

Advanced: natural language processing, speech recognition

Basic compared to NAOAdvanced but less focused on personal interaction
R&D Support

Strong community, continuous improvements

Emerging, less establishedSupported but less healthcare-focused
Track Record

Proven in educational and therapeutic settings

Less proven in diverse settingsUsed in customer service, less in therapy
Safety and Accessibility

Designed with safety, accessible size and mobility

Safe but less interactive for cognitive tasksSafe but larger and less accessible

References

[1] Henkemans, O. A. B., Bierman, B. P., Janssen, J., Neerincx, M. A., Looije, R., van der Bosch, H., & van der Giessen, J. A. (2013). Using a robot to personalise health education for children with diabetes type 1: A pilot study. Patient education and counseling92(2), 174-181.