Wiki source code of 3. Evaluation Methods
Version 3.8 by Jean-Paul Smit on 2024/03/01 02:34
Hide last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
| |
3.5 | 1 | To ground the design rationale in practice, the prototype of the NAO for PwD will be evaluated in a formative evaluation with the PwD (subject) and their caregivers. The evaluation will investigate the process of how interaction with the NAO can alleviate potential symptoms caused by early-stage dementia in PwD. The study will focus on the prototype's potential effects, which are based on the desired value of autonomy as a part of self-direction. |
| |
3.2 | 2 | |
| 3 | The study will investigate the claims on the following questions: | ||
| 4 | |||
| |
3.5 | 5 | ~1. Does the design increase the sense of //autonomy //in PwD? |
| |
3.3 | 6 | |
| |
3.6 | 7 | 2. Does the design positively affect PwD's //affective //state? |
| |
3.3 | 8 | |
| |
3.6 | 9 | 3. Is the design //dependable//; do PwD sense that they can rely on it? |
| |
3.3 | 10 | |
| 11 | |||
| |
3.7 | 12 | In order to |
| 13 | |||
| 14 | |||
| |
3.8 | 15 | Bethel, C.L., Henkel, Z., Baugus, K. (2020). Conducting Studies in Human-Robot Interaction. In: Jost, C., //et al.// Human-Robot Interaction. Springer Series on Bio- and Neurosystems, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https:~/~/doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_4 |
| |
3.7 | 16 | |
| 17 | |||
| |
3.4 | 18 |