Wiki source code of 3. Evaluation Methods

Version 3.10 by Jean-Paul Smit on 2024/03/01 02:35

Hide last authors
Jean-Paul Smit 3.5 1 To ground the design rationale in practice, the prototype of the NAO for PwD will be evaluated in a formative evaluation with the PwD (subject) and their caregivers. The evaluation will investigate the process of how interaction with the NAO can alleviate potential symptoms caused by early-stage dementia in PwD.  The study will focus on the prototype's potential effects, which are based on the desired value of autonomy as a part of self-direction.
Jean-Paul Smit 3.2 2
3 The study will investigate the claims on the following questions:
4
Jean-Paul Smit 3.5 5 ~1. Does the design increase the sense of //autonomy //in PwD?
Jean-Paul Smit 3.3 6
Jean-Paul Smit 3.6 7 2. Does the design positively affect PwD's //affective //state?
Jean-Paul Smit 3.3 8
Jean-Paul Smit 3.6 9 3. Is the design //dependable//; do PwD sense that they can rely on it?
Jean-Paul Smit 3.3 10
11
Jean-Paul Smit 3.10 12 To
Jean-Paul Smit 3.7 13
14
Jean-Paul Smit 3.10 15 == References ==
16
Jean-Paul Smit 3.9 17 (1) Bethel, C.L., Henkel, Z., Baugus, K. (2020). Conducting Studies in Human-Robot Interaction. In: Jost, C., //et al.// Human-Robot Interaction. Springer Series on Bio- and Neurosystems, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https:~/~/doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_4
Jean-Paul Smit 3.7 18
19
Jean-Paul Smit 3.4 20