Changes for page 3. Evaluation Methods
Last modified by William OGrady on 2024/04/08 22:22
From version 56.1
edited by William OGrady
on 2024/04/08 22:22
on 2024/04/08 22:22
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 49.1
edited by Diederik Heijbroek
on 2024/04/07 20:22
on 2024/04/07 20:22
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -xwiki:XWiki. WilliamOGrady1 +xwiki:XWiki.DiederikHeijbroek - Content
-
... ... @@ -1,7 +1,9 @@ 1 1 == Overview == 2 2 3 -To ground the design rationale in practice, the prototype of the NAO for the PwD will be evaluated in a formative evaluation with the PwD and their caregivers. The evaluation will investigate the process of how interaction with the NAO can alleviate potential symptoms caused by early-stage dementia in PwD s. Three methods of evaluation will be applied to have reliable and accurate results, as Bethel. et al (2020)[1] suggests.The study will focus on the prototype's potential effects, which are based on the desired value of autonomy as a part of self-direction.3 +To ground the design rationale in practice, the prototype of the NAO for the PwD will be evaluated in a formative evaluation with the PwD and their caregivers. The evaluation will investigate the process of how interaction with the NAO can alleviate potential symptoms caused by early-stage dementia in PwD. Three methods of evaluation will be applied to have reliable and accurate results, as Bethel. et al (2020)[1] suggests. 4 4 5 +The study will focus on the prototype's potential effects, which are based on the desired value of autonomy as a part of self-direction. Before the study, possible confounding variables need to be examined such as the PwD's attitude towards robots and the** relatedness** and **competence**. 6 + 5 5 ==== ==== 6 6 7 7 == Study Design Variables == ... ... @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ 10 10 11 11 1. **Relatedness. **Does the design positively affect the PwD's //affective //state? 12 12 11. **Affect**. How do participants feel about using the NAO in this state? 13 -11. **Attitude towards Technology**. Whatdo people think about using technology? Are they biased towards the NAO before the study?15 +11. **Attitude towards Technology**. How do people think about using technology? Are they biased towards the NAO before the study? 14 14 1. **Competence. **Is the design //competent//; is the design capable enough for the PwD to rely on it? 15 15 11. **Memory self-efficacy **(pre-study) How good are participants at remembering information? 16 16 11. **Memory recall **(post-study) Can the participant accurately retrieve information through the NAO?