Skip to Content

Changes for page 3. Evaluation Methods

Last modified by William OGrady on 2024/04/08 22:22
From version 5.2
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/03/01 02:44
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 3.3
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/03/01 02:31
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,22 +1,43 @@
1 -To ground the design rationale in practice, the prototype of the NAO for PwD will be evaluated in a formative evaluation with the PwD (subject) and their caregivers. The evaluation will investigate the process of how interaction with the NAO can alleviate potential symptoms caused by early-stage dementia in PwD.  Three methods of evaluation will be applied to have reliable and accurate results, as Bethel. et al (2020)[1] suggests. The study will focus on the prototype's potential effects, which are based on the desired value of autonomy as a part of self-directio
1 +To ground the design rationale in practice, the prototype of the NAO for PwD will be evaluated in a formative evaluation with the PwD (subject) and their caregivers. The evaluation will investigate the process of how interaction with the NAO can alleviate potential symptoms caused by early-stage dementia in PwD.  The study will be conducted focused on the prototype's potential effects, which are based on desired values of self-direction, security and conformity.
2 2  
3 -==== Study design claims ====
4 -
5 5  The study will investigate the claims on the following questions:
6 6  
7 -~1. Does the design increase the sense of //autonomy //in PwD?
5 +~1. Does the design increase the sense of autonomy in PwD?
8 8  
9 -2. Does the design positively affect PwD's //affective //state?
7 +2. Does the design have a positive effect on PwD's emotional/affective state?
10 10  
11 -3. Is the design //dependable//; do PwD sense that they can rely on it?
9 +3. Is the design dependable; do PwD sense that they can rely on it?
12 12  
13 13  
14 -Before the study, possible confounding variables need to be examined such as the subject's attitude towards robots and the baseline sense of affect and autonomy. For a sample size as small as 20 participants, it is most adequate to apply a within-subjects design[1].
12 +**Positive effects:**
15 15  
14 +**//Measuring sense of autonomy~://**
16 16  
17 -[[image:Socio-Cognitive Engineering - Frame 1.jpg]]
16 +//Have the PwD rate themselves on a scale 1-5.//
18 18  
18 +//Have the relatives rate the PwD on a scale 1-5.//
19 19  
20 -== References ==
20 +//Evaluate how often PwD asks for clarification in a conversation with relatives in #Questions asked.//
21 21  
22 -(1) Bethel, C.L., Henkel, Z., Baugus, K. (2020). Conducting Studies in Human-Robot Interaction. In: Jost, C., //et al.// Human-Robot Interaction. Springer Series on Bio- and Neurosystems, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https:~/~/doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_4
22 +**//Measuring the prevention of negative emotions such as stress~://**
23 +
24 +//Have the PwD rate themselves on a scale 1-5.//
25 +
26 +//How often a PwD has a stressed/upset moment according to NAO.//
27 +
28 +**//Measuring trust in the PwD~://**
29 +
30 +//How many times a relative calls PwD to check in.//
31 +
32 +
33 +**Negative effects:**
34 +
35 +**//Causing negative emotions with upsetting information~://**
36 +
37 +//Have the PwD rate themselves on a scale 1-5.//
38 +
39 +//How often a PwD has a stressed/upset moment according to NAO.//
40 +
41 +**//Overloading the PwD with information~://**
42 +
43 +//Percentage of information re-asked by the PwD.//
Socio-Cognitive Engineering - Frame 1.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -xwiki:XWiki.jeanpaulsmit
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -897.4 KB
Content