Skip to Content

Changes for page 3. Evaluation Methods

Last modified by William OGrady on 2024/04/08 22:22
From version 49.1
edited by Diederik Heijbroek
on 2024/04/07 20:22
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 51.1
edited by William OGrady
on 2024/04/08 16:31
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -xwiki:XWiki.DiederikHeijbroek
1 +xwiki:XWiki.WilliamOGrady
Content
... ... @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
1 1  == Overview ==
2 2  
3 -To ground the design rationale in practice, the prototype of the NAO for the PwD will be evaluated in a formative evaluation with the PwD and their caregivers. The evaluation will investigate the process of how interaction with the NAO can alleviate potential symptoms caused by early-stage dementia in PwD.  Three methods of evaluation will be applied to have reliable and accurate results, as Bethel. et al (2020)[1] suggests.
3 +To ground the design rationale in practice, the prototype of the NAO for the PwD will be evaluated in a formative evaluation with the PwD and their caregivers. The evaluation will investigate the process of how interaction with the NAO can alleviate potential symptoms caused by early-stage dementia in PwDs. Three methods of evaluation will be applied to have reliable and accurate results, as Bethel. et al (2020)[1] suggests.
4 4  
5 -The study will focus on the prototype's potential effects, which are based on the desired value of autonomy as a part of self-direction. Before the study, possible confounding variables need to be examined such as the PwD's attitude towards robots and the** relatedness** and **competence**.
5 +The study will focus on the prototype's potential effects, which are based on the desired value of autonomy as a part of self-direction. Before the study, possible confounding variables need to be examined such as the PwD's attitude towards robots and their** relatedness** and **competence**.
6 6  
7 7  ==== ====
8 8  
... ... @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
12 12  
13 13  1. **Relatedness. **Does the design positively affect the PwD's //affective //state?
14 14  11. **Affect**. How do participants feel about using the NAO in this state?
15 -11. **Attitude towards Technology**. How do people think about using technology? Are they biased towards the NAO before the study?
15 +11. **Attitude towards Technology**. What do people think about using technology? Are they biased towards the NAO before the study?
16 16  1. **Competence. **Is the design //competent//; is the design capable enough for the PwD to rely on it?
17 17  11. **Memory self-efficacy **(pre-study) How good are participants at remembering information?
18 18  11. **Memory recall **(post-study) Can the participant accurately retrieve information through the NAO?