Changes for page 3. Evaluation Methods
Last modified by William OGrady on 2024/04/08 22:22
From version 47.1
edited by William OGrady
on 2024/04/06 11:27
on 2024/04/06 11:27
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 46.1
edited by William OGrady
on 2024/04/06 11:27
on 2024/04/06 11:27
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -23,9 +23,13 @@ 23 23 24 24 == Surveys == 25 25 26 -Affect will be measured by the Self-Assessment Manikin [2] that takes less than a minute. It will be used for both pre-experiment and post-experiment evaluation. For Attitude towards robots, we build upon the works of [reference] and create a set of two 1-minute questions. A well-suited tool for Memory self-efficacy is the mini-mental state examination [3]. We adopt it to fit to the ecological validity and domain of interest in our study.26 +Affect will be measured by the Self-Assessment Manikin [2] that takes less than a minute. It will be used for both pre-experiment and post-experiment evaluation. 27 27 28 +For Attitude towards robots, we build upon the works of [reference] and create a set of two 1-minute questions. 28 28 30 +A well-suited tool for Memory self-efficacy is the mini-mental state examination [3]. We adopt it to fit to the ecological validity and domain of interest in our study. 31 + 32 + 29 29 == References == 30 30 31 31 [1] Bethel, C.L., Henkel, Z., Baugus, K. (2020). Conducting Studies in Human-Robot Interaction. In: Jost, C., //et al.// Human-Robot Interaction. Springer Series on Bio- and Neurosystems, vol 12. Springer, Cham. [[https:~~/~~/doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_4>>https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_4]]