Skip to Content

Changes for page 3. Evaluation Methods

Last modified by William OGrady on 2024/04/08 22:22
From version 45.1
edited by William OGrady
on 2024/04/04 15:01
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 40.1
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/04/01 13:00
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -xwiki:XWiki.WilliamOGrady
1 +xwiki:XWiki.jeanpaulsmit
Content
... ... @@ -1,14 +1,15 @@
1 1  To ground the design rationale in practice, the prototype of the NAO for the PwD will be evaluated in a formative evaluation with the PwD and their caregivers. The evaluation will investigate the process of how interaction with the NAO can alleviate potential symptoms caused by early-stage dementia in PwD.  Three methods of evaluation will be applied to have reliable and accurate results, as Bethel. et al (2020)[1] suggests.
2 2  
3 -The study will focus on the prototype's potential effects, which are based on the desired value of autonomy as a part of self-direction. Before the study, possible confounding variables need to be examined such as the PwD's attitude towards robots and the** relatedness** and **competence**.
3 +The study will focus on the prototype's potential effects, which are based on the desired value of autonomy as a part of self-direction. Before the study, possible confounding variables need to be examined such as the PwD's attitude towards robots and the **autonomy, relatedness** and **competence**.
4 4  
5 5  ==== ====
6 6  
7 -== Study Design Variables ==
7 +== //**Study design variables**// ==
8 8  
9 9  The study will hypothesize on the following variables with regards to the system:
10 10  
11 11  
12 +1. **Autonomy. **Does the design increase the sense of //autonomy //in a PwD?
12 12  1. **Relatedness. **Does the design positively affect the PwD's //affective //state?
13 13  11. **Affect**. How do participants feel about using the robot in this state?
14 14  11. **Attitude towards Technology**. How do people think about using technology? Are they biased towards the robot before the study?
... ... @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
21 21  [[image:3\. Evaluation.b\. Test.WebHome@Socio-Cognitive Engineering - Frame 1.jpg]]
22 22  
23 23  
24 -== Surveys ==
25 +=== Surveys ===
25 25  
26 26  Affect will be measured by the Self-Assessment Manikin [2] that takes less than a minute. It will be used for both pre-experiment and post-experiment evaluation.
27 27  
... ... @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
30 30  A well-suited tool for Memory self-efficacy is the mini-mental state examination [3]. We adopt it to fit to the ecological validity and domain of interest in our study.
31 31  
32 32  
33 -== References ==
34 +== //**References**// ==
34 34  
35 35  [1] Bethel, C.L., Henkel, Z., Baugus, K. (2020). Conducting Studies in Human-Robot Interaction. In: Jost, C., //et al.// Human-Robot Interaction. Springer Series on Bio- and Neurosystems, vol 12. Springer, Cham. [[https:~~/~~/doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_4>>https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_4]]
36 36