Skip to Content

Changes for page 3. Evaluation Methods

Last modified by William OGrady on 2024/04/08 22:22
From version 43.1
edited by William OGrady
on 2024/04/04 14:08
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 45.1
edited by William OGrady
on 2024/04/04 15:01
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
4 4  
5 5  ==== ====
6 6  
7 -== //**Study design variables**// ==
7 +== Study Design Variables ==
8 8  
9 9  The study will hypothesize on the following variables with regards to the system:
10 10  
... ... @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
21 21  [[image:3\. Evaluation.b\. Test.WebHome@Socio-Cognitive Engineering - Frame 1.jpg]]
22 22  
23 23  
24 -== //**Surveys**// ==
24 +== Surveys ==
25 25  
26 26  Affect will be measured by the Self-Assessment Manikin [2] that takes less than a minute. It will be used for both pre-experiment and post-experiment evaluation.
27 27  
... ... @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
30 30  A well-suited tool for Memory self-efficacy is the mini-mental state examination [3]. We adopt it to fit to the ecological validity and domain of interest in our study.
31 31  
32 32  
33 -== //**References**// ==
33 +== References ==
34 34  
35 35  [1] Bethel, C.L., Henkel, Z., Baugus, K. (2020). Conducting Studies in Human-Robot Interaction. In: Jost, C., //et al.// Human-Robot Interaction. Springer Series on Bio- and Neurosystems, vol 12. Springer, Cham. [[https:~~/~~/doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_4>>https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_4]]
36 36