Skip to Content

Changes for page 3. Evaluation Methods

Last modified by William OGrady on 2024/04/08 22:22
From version 4.1
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/03/01 02:37
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 4.4
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/03/01 02:41
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
1 -To ground the design rationale in practice, the prototype of the NAO for PwD will be evaluated in a formative evaluation with the PwD (subject) and their caregivers. The evaluation will investigate the process of how interaction with the NAO can alleviate potential symptoms caused by early-stage dementia in PwD.  The study will focus on the prototype's potential effects, which are based on the desired value of autonomy as a part of self-direction.
1 +To ground the design rationale in practice, the prototype of the NAO for PwD will be evaluated in a formative evaluation with the PwD (subject) and their caregivers. The evaluation will investigate the process of how interaction with the NAO can alleviate potential symptoms caused by early-stage dementia in PwD.  Three methods of evaluation will be applied to have reliable and accurate results, as Bethel. et al (2020)[1] suggests. The study will focus on the prototype's potential effects, which are based on the desired value of autonomy as a part of self-directio
2 2  
3 +==== Study design claims ====
4 +
3 3  The study will investigate the claims on the following questions:
4 4  
5 5  ~1. Does the design increase the sense of //autonomy //in PwD?
... ... @@ -15,5 +15,3 @@
15 15  == References ==
16 16  
17 17  (1) Bethel, C.L., Henkel, Z., Baugus, K. (2020). Conducting Studies in Human-Robot Interaction. In: Jost, C., //et al.// Human-Robot Interaction. Springer Series on Bio- and Neurosystems, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https:~/~/doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_4
18 -
19 -