Skip to Content

Changes for page 3. Evaluation Methods

Last modified by William OGrady on 2024/04/08 22:22
From version 37.2
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/03/26 15:44
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 38.1
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/03/27 17:58
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
17 17  11. **Memory self-efficacy **(pre-study) How good are participants at remembering information?
18 18  11. **Memory recall **(post-study) Can the participant accurately retrieve information through the robot?
19 19  
20 -
21 21  For a sample size as small as 20 participants, it is most adequate to apply a within-subjects design (they require fewer participants) [1]. That means there is an approach where every PwD is experiencing all of the conditions examined. A within-subjects design might be prone to confounds such as pre-existing notions in the environment. That is why the attitude towards robots and the pre-study sense of affect and autonomy should be examined and evaluated as such.
22 22  
23 23  [[image:Socio-Cognitive Engineering - Frame 1(4).jpg]]
... ... @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
27 27  
28 28  For autonomy, a validated survey tool is the self-care score as used in the Diabetes research paper of PAL by Neerincx et al.
29 29  
30 -Affect can be measured with a button ([[http:~~/~~/ii.tudelft.nl/~~~~joostb/affectbutton_version2_original.html>>url:http://ii.tudelft.nl/~~joostb/affectbutton_version2_original.html]]) that takes less than a minute. It will be used for both pre-experiment and post-experiment evaluation.
29 +Affect will be measured by the Self-Assessment Manikin [2] that takes less than a minute. It will be used for both pre-experiment and post-experiment evaluation.
31 31  
32 32  For Attitude towards robots, we build upon the works of [reference] and create a set of two 1-minute questions.
33 33  
... ... @@ -36,4 +36,6 @@
36 36  
37 37  == //**References**// ==
38 38  
39 -[1] Bethel, C.L., Henkel, Z., Baugus, K. (2020). Conducting Studies in Human-Robot Interaction. In: Jost, C., //et al.// Human-Robot Interaction. Springer Series on Bio- and Neurosystems, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https:~/~/doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_4
38 +[1] Bethel, C.L., Henkel, Z., Baugus, K. (2020). Conducting Studies in Human-Robot Interaction. In: Jost, C., //et al.// Human-Robot Interaction. Springer Series on Bio- and Neurosystems, vol 12. Springer, Cham. [[https:~~/~~/doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_4>>https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_4]]
39 +
40 +[2] Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. //Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry//, //25//(1), 49-59.