Changes for page 3. Evaluation Methods
Last modified by William OGrady on 2024/04/08 22:22
From version 37.1
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/03/26 11:59
on 2024/03/26 11:59
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 30.1
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/03/21 17:06
on 2024/03/21 17:06
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
-
Attachments (0 modified, 0 added, 2 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -2,28 +2,26 @@ 2 2 3 3 The study will focus on the prototype's potential effects, which are based on the desired value of autonomy as a part of self-direction. Before the study, possible confounding variables need to be examined such as the PwD's attitude towards robots and the **autonomy, relatedness** and **competence**. 4 4 5 -==== ==== 5 +==== Study design claims ==== 6 6 7 - ==//**Studydesignvariables**// ==7 +The study will investigate the claims on the following questions: 8 8 9 - Thestudywill hypothesizeonthefollowing variableswithregards to the system:9 +~1. **Autonomy. **Does the design increase the sense of //autonomy //in a PwD? 10 10 11 +2. **Relatedness. **Does the design positively affect the PwD's //affective //state? Do PwDs //like// the system? 11 11 12 -1. **Autonomy. **Does the design increase the sense of //autonomy //in a PwD? 13 -1. **Relatedness. **Does the design positively affect the PwD's //affective //state? 14 -11. **Affect**. How do participants feel about using the robot in this state? 15 -11. **Attitude towards Technology**. How do people think about using technology? Are they biased towards the robot before the study? 16 -1. **Competence. **Is the design //competent//; is the design capable enough for the PwD to rely on it? 17 -11. **Memory self-efficacy **(pre-study) How good are participants at remembering information? 18 -11. **Memory recall **(post-study) Can the participant accurately retrieve information through the robot? 13 +3. **Competence. **Is the design //dependable//; is the design accessible enough for the PwD to rely on it? Does it feel natural? 19 19 20 - 15 +4. **Memory self-efficacy** and **Recall**.(pre-study) How good are participants at remembering information? (post-study) Can the participant accurately retrieve information through the robot? 21 21 22 - Fora sample size as small as 20 participants,itis most adequatetoapply awithin-subjects design (they require fewer participants)[1].That means there is anapproach where everyPwDisexperiencingall ofthe conditionsexamined. A within-subjectsdesignmightbe pronetoconfoundssuch as pre-existingnotions in theenvironment. That iswhy theattitudetowardsrobots and thepre-studysense ofaffectand autonomy should beexamined and evaluated assuch.17 +5. **Attitude towards Technology**. How do people think about using technology? Are they biased towards the robot before the study? 23 23 24 -[[image:Socio-Cognitive Engineering - Frame 1(4).jpg]] 25 25 20 +For a sample size as small as 20 participants, it is most adequate to apply a within-subjects design (they require fewer participants) [1]. That means there is an approach where every PwD is experiencing all of the conditions examined. A within-subjects design might be prone to confounds such as pre-existing notions in the environment. That is why the attitude towards robots and the pre-study sense of affect and autonomy should be examined and evaluated as such. Another confounder variable to look into is the study location and environment. 26 26 27 - ==//**References**//==22 +[[image:Socio-Cognitive Engineering - Frame 1.jpg]] 28 28 24 + 25 +== References == 26 + 29 29 [1] Bethel, C.L., Henkel, Z., Baugus, K. (2020). Conducting Studies in Human-Robot Interaction. In: Jost, C., //et al.// Human-Robot Interaction. Springer Series on Bio- and Neurosystems, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https:~/~/doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_4
- Socio-Cognitive Engineering - Frame 1(2).jpg
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -xwiki:XWiki.jeanpaulsmit - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2.1 MB - Content
- Socio-Cognitive Engineering - Frame 1(4).jpg
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -xwiki:XWiki.jeanpaulsmit - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2.2 MB - Content