Skip to Content

Changes for page 3. Evaluation Methods

Last modified by William OGrady on 2024/04/08 22:22
From version 31.1
edited by William OGrady
on 2024/03/25 14:33
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 35.1
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/03/26 11:43
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -xwiki:XWiki.WilliamOGrady
1 +xwiki:XWiki.jeanpaulsmit
Content
... ... @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
14 14  
15 15  3. **Competence. **Is the design //dependable//; is the design accessible enough for the PwD to rely on it? Does it feel natural?
16 16  
17 -4. **Memory self-efficacy** and **Recall**.(pre-study) How good are participants at remembering information? (post-study) Can the participant accurately retrieve information through the robot?
17 +4. **Memory self-efficacy** and **Recall **(pre-study) How good are participants at remembering information? (post-study) Can the participant accurately retrieve information through the robot?
18 18  
19 19  5. **Attitude towards Technology**. How do people think about using technology? Are they biased towards the robot before the study?
20 20  
... ... @@ -24,6 +24,6 @@
24 24  [[image:Socio-Cognitive Engineering - Frame 1.jpg]]
25 25  
26 26  
27 -== References ==
27 +== //**References**// ==
28 28  
29 29  [1] Bethel, C.L., Henkel, Z., Baugus, K. (2020). Conducting Studies in Human-Robot Interaction. In: Jost, C., //et al.// Human-Robot Interaction. Springer Series on Bio- and Neurosystems, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https:~/~/doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_4
Socio-Cognitive Engineering - Frame 1(2).jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +xwiki:XWiki.jeanpaulsmit
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2.1 MB
Content