Skip to Content

Changes for page 3. Evaluation Methods

Last modified by William OGrady on 2024/04/08 22:22
From version 30.1
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/03/21 17:06
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 32.1
edited by William OGrady
on 2024/03/25 14:34
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -xwiki:XWiki.jeanpaulsmit
1 +xwiki:XWiki.WilliamOGrady
Content
... ... @@ -2,8 +2,10 @@
2 2  
3 3  The study will focus on the prototype's potential effects, which are based on the desired value of autonomy as a part of self-direction. Before the study, possible confounding variables need to be examined such as the PwD's attitude towards robots and the **autonomy, relatedness** and **competence**.
4 4  
5 -==== Study design claims ====
5 +==== ====
6 6  
7 +== //**Study design claims**// ==
8 +
7 7  The study will investigate the claims on the following questions:
8 8  
9 9  ~1. **Autonomy. **Does the design increase the sense of //autonomy //in a PwD?
... ... @@ -22,6 +22,6 @@
22 22  [[image:Socio-Cognitive Engineering - Frame 1.jpg]]
23 23  
24 24  
25 -== References ==
27 +== //**References**// ==
26 26  
27 27  [1] Bethel, C.L., Henkel, Z., Baugus, K. (2020). Conducting Studies in Human-Robot Interaction. In: Jost, C., //et al.// Human-Robot Interaction. Springer Series on Bio- and Neurosystems, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https:~/~/doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_4