Skip to Content

Changes for page 3. Evaluation Methods

Last modified by William OGrady on 2024/04/08 22:22
From version 3.8
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/03/01 02:34
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 1.1
edited by Ruud de Jong
on 2024/02/12 12:34
Change comment: Imported from XAR

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -xwiki:XWiki.jeanpaulsmit
1 +xwiki:XWiki.RuuddeJong
Content
... ... @@ -1,18 +1,0 @@
1 -To ground the design rationale in practice, the prototype of the NAO for PwD will be evaluated in a formative evaluation with the PwD (subject) and their caregivers. The evaluation will investigate the process of how interaction with the NAO can alleviate potential symptoms caused by early-stage dementia in PwD.  The study will focus on the prototype's potential effects, which are based on the desired value of autonomy as a part of self-direction.
2 -
3 -The study will investigate the claims on the following questions:
4 -
5 -~1. Does the design increase the sense of //autonomy //in PwD?
6 -
7 -2. Does the design positively affect PwD's //affective //state?
8 -
9 -3. Is the design //dependable//; do PwD sense that they can rely on it?
10 -
11 -
12 -In order to
13 -
14 -
15 -Bethel, C.L., Henkel, Z., Baugus, K. (2020). Conducting Studies in Human-Robot Interaction. In: Jost, C., //et al.// Human-Robot Interaction. Springer Series on Bio- and Neurosystems, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https:~/~/doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_4
16 -
17 -
18 -