Skip to Content

Changes for page 3. Evaluation Methods

Last modified by William OGrady on 2024/04/08 22:22
From version 3.7
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/03/01 02:34
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 3.4
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/03/01 02:31
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,18 +1,12 @@
1 -To ground the design rationale in practice, the prototype of the NAO for PwD will be evaluated in a formative evaluation with the PwD (subject) and their caregivers. The evaluation will investigate the process of how interaction with the NAO can alleviate potential symptoms caused by early-stage dementia in PwD.  The study will focus on the prototype's potential effects, which are based on the desired value of autonomy as a part of self-direction.
1 +To ground the design rationale in practice, the prototype of the NAO for PwD will be evaluated in a formative evaluation with the PwD (subject) and their caregivers. The evaluation will investigate the process of how interaction with the NAO can alleviate potential symptoms caused by early-stage dementia in PwD.  The study will be conducted focused on the prototype's potential effects, which are based on desired values of self-direction, security and conformity.
2 2  
3 3  The study will investigate the claims on the following questions:
4 4  
5 -~1. Does the design increase the sense of //autonomy //in PwD?
5 +~1. Does the design increase the sense of autonomy in PwD?
6 6  
7 -2. Does the design positively affect PwD's //affective //state?
7 +2. Does the design have a positive effect on PwD's emotional/affective state?
8 8  
9 -3. Is the design //dependable//; do PwD sense that they can rely on it?
9 +3. Is the design dependable; do PwD sense that they can rely on it?
10 10  
11 11  
12 -In order to
13 -
14 -
15 -Conducting studies in hri
16 -
17 -
18 18