Skip to Content

Changes for page 3. Evaluation Methods

Last modified by William OGrady on 2024/04/08 22:22
From version 3.1
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/03/01 02:17
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 3.12
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/03/01 02:37
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,19 @@
1 -The performance of the robot can be assessed by methods x.
1 +To ground the design rationale in practice, the prototype of the NAO for PwD will be evaluated in a formative evaluation with the PwD (subject) and their caregivers. The evaluation will investigate the process of how interaction with the NAO can alleviate potential symptoms caused by early-stage dementia in PwD.  The study will focus on the prototype's potential effects, which are based on the desired value of autonomy as a part of self-direction.
2 +
3 +The study will investigate the claims on the following questions:
4 +
5 +~1. Does the design increase the sense of //autonomy //in PwD?
6 +
7 +2. Does the design positively affect PwD's //affective //state?
8 +
9 +3. Is the design //dependable//; do PwD sense that they can rely on it?
10 +
11 +
12 +[[image:Socio-Cognitive Engineering - Frame 1.jpg]]
13 +
14 +
15 +== References ==
16 +
17 +(1) Bethel, C.L., Henkel, Z., Baugus, K. (2020). Conducting Studies in Human-Robot Interaction. In: Jost, C., //et al.// Human-Robot Interaction. Springer Series on Bio- and Neurosystems, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https:~/~/doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_4
18 +
19 +
Socio-Cognitive Engineering - Frame 1.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +xwiki:XWiki.jeanpaulsmit
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +897.4 KB
Content