Skip to Content

Changes for page 3. Evaluation Methods

Last modified by William OGrady on 2024/04/08 22:22
From version 27.2
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/03/21 17:03
Change comment: Added comment
To version 26.1
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/03/21 16:57
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@
10 10  
11 11  2. **Relatedness. **Does the design positively affect the PwD's //affective //state? Do PwDs //like// the system?
12 12  
13 -3. **Competence. **Is the design //dependable//; is the design accessible enough for the PwD to rely on it? Does it feel natural?
13 +3. **Competence. **Is the design //dependable//; is the design accessible enough for the PwD to rely on it? Does it feel natural? Can the participant accurately retrieve information through the robot?
14 14  
15 -4. **Recall**. Can the participant accurately retrieve information through the robot?
15 +4. Recall.
16 16  
17 17  5. Memory self-efficacy.
18 18  
XWiki.XWikiComments[1]
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -xwiki:XWiki.jeanpaulsmit
Comment
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Thank you for this valuable suggestion, we adjusted our study design based on it already. Now, would you say that 4-5 dependent variables is too much to evaluate in our study or will it suffice within the time? For example Affect can be measured with a button ([[http:~~/~~/ii.tudelft.nl/~~~~joostb/affectbutton_version2_original.html>>http://ii.tudelft.nl/~~joostb/affectbutton_version2_original.html]]) that takes less than a minute, but the other variables will add up some time.
Date
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2024-03-21 17:03:29.591
Reply To
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -0