Skip to Content

Changes for page 3. Evaluation Methods

Last modified by William OGrady on 2024/04/08 22:22
From version 22.1
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/03/04 10:51
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 3.2
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/03/01 02:29
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -xwiki:XWiki.RixtHellinga
1 +xwiki:XWiki.jeanpaulsmit
Content
... ... @@ -1,25 +1,36 @@
1 -To ground the design rationale in practice, the prototype of the NAO for the subject will be evaluated in a formative evaluation with the subject and their caregivers. The evaluation will investigate the process of how interaction with the NAO can alleviate potential symptoms caused by early-stage dementia in subjects.  Three methods of evaluation will be applied to have reliable and accurate results, as Bethel. et al (2020)[1] suggests.
1 +To ground the design rationale in practice, the prototype of the NAO for PwD will be evaluated in a formative evaluation with the PwD (subject) and their caregivers. The evaluation will investigate the process of how interaction with the NAO can alleviate potential symptoms caused by early-stage dementia in PwD.  The study will be conducted focused on the prototype's potential effects, which are based on desired values of self-direction, security and conformity.
2 2  
3 -The study will focus on the prototype's potential effects, which are based on the desired value of autonomy as a part of self-direction. Before the study, possible confounding variables need to be examined such as the subject's attitude towards robots and the **autonomy, relatedness** and **competence**.
3 +The study will investigate the claims on the following questions:
4 4  
5 -==== Study design claims ====
5 +**Positive effects:**
6 6  
7 -The study will investigate the claims on the following questions:
7 +**//Measuring sense of autonomy~://**
8 8  
9 -~1. **Autonomy. **Does the design increase the sense of //autonomy //in a subject?
9 +//Have the PwD rate themselves on a scale 1-5.//
10 10  
11 -2. **Relatedness. **Does the design positively affect the subject's //affective //state? Do subjects //like// the system?
11 +//Have the relatives rate the PwD on a scale 1-5.//
12 12  
13 -3. **Competence. **Is the design //dependable//; is the design accessible enough for the subject to rely on it? Does it feel natural?
13 +//Evaluate how often PwD asks for clarification in a conversation with relatives in #Questions asked.//
14 14  
15 +**//Measuring the prevention of negative emotions such as stress~://**
15 15  
16 -For a sample size as small as 20 participants, it is most adequate to apply a within-subjects design (they require fewer participants) [1]. That means there is an approach where every subject is experiencing all of the conditions examined. A within-subjects design might be prone to confounds such as pre-existing notions in the environment. That is why the attitude towards robots and the pre-study sense of affect and autonomy should be examined and evaluated as such. Another confounder variable to look into is the study location and environment.
17 +//Have the PwD rate themselves on a scale 1-5.//
17 17  
18 -[[image:Socio-Cognitive Engineering - Frame 1.jpg]]
19 +//How often a PwD has a stressed/upset moment according to NAO.//
19 19  
20 -/
21 +**//Measuring trust in the PwD~://**
21 21  
23 +//How many times a relative calls PwD to check in.//
22 22  
23 -== References ==
24 24  
25 -(1) Bethel, C.L., Henkel, Z., Baugus, K. (2020). Conducting Studies in Human-Robot Interaction. In: Jost, C., //et al.// Human-Robot Interaction. Springer Series on Bio- and Neurosystems, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https:~/~/doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_4
26 +**Negative effects:**
27 +
28 +**//Causing negative emotions with upsetting information~://**
29 +
30 +//Have the PwD rate themselves on a scale 1-5.//
31 +
32 +//How often a PwD has a stressed/upset moment according to NAO.//
33 +
34 +**//Overloading the PwD with information~://**
35 +
36 +//Percentage of information re-asked by the PwD.//
Socio-Cognitive Engineering - Frame 1.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -xwiki:XWiki.jeanpaulsmit
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -897.4 KB
Content