Skip to Content

Changes for page 3. Evaluation Methods

Last modified by William OGrady on 2024/04/08 22:22
From version 21.1
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/03/03 23:30
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 20.1
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/03/03 23:28
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
2 2  Three of these methods could be the Wizard of Oz method, the Thinking out loud method, and the Cooperative Evaluation method. Each of which can be concluded with a self-assessment expressed in questions posed to the subjects. This combination of evaluation methods allows for the results to have an input from the subject as well as input from the experts method.
3 3  
4 4  
5 -The study will focus on the prototype's potential effects, which are based on the desired value of autonomy as a part of self-direction. Before the study, possible confounding variables need to be examined such as the subject's attitude towards robots and the **autonomy, affinity** and **security**.
5 +The study will focus on the prototype's potential effects, which are based on the desired value of autonomy as a part of self-direction. Before the study, possible confounding variables need to be examined such as the subject's attitude towards robots and the **autonomy, relatedness** and **security**.
6 6  
7 7  ==== Study design claims ====
8 8