Skip to Content

Changes for page 3. Evaluation Methods

Last modified by William OGrady on 2024/04/08 22:22
From version 13.1
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/03/01 11:36
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 10.1
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/03/01 11:19
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
1 -To ground the design rationale in practice, the prototype of the NAO for PwD will be evaluated in a formative evaluation with the PwD (subject) and their caregivers. The evaluation will investigate the process of how interaction with the NAO can alleviate potential symptoms caused by early-stage dementia in PwD.  Three methods of evaluation will be applied to have reliable and accurate results, as Bethel. et al (2020)[1] suggests. The study will focus on the prototype's potential effects, which are based on the desired value of autonomy as a part of self-direction. Before the study, possible confounding variables need to be examined such as the subject's attitude towards robots and the **autonomy, relatedness** and **security**.
1 +To ground the design rationale in practice, the prototype of the NAO for PwD will be evaluated in a formative evaluation with the PwD (subject) and their caregivers. The evaluation will investigate the process of how interaction with the NAO can alleviate potential symptoms caused by early-stage dementia in PwD.  Three methods of evaluation will be applied to have reliable and accurate results, as Bethel. et al (2020)[1] suggests. The study will focus on the prototype's potential effects, which are based on the desired value of autonomy as a part of self-direction. Before the study, possible confounding variables need to be examined such as the subject's attitude towards robots and the baseline sense of affect and autonomy.
2 2  
3 3  ==== Study design claims ====
4 4  
... ... @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
6 6  
7 7  ~1. Does the design increase the sense of //autonomy //in PwD?
8 8  
9 -2. Does the design positively affect PwD's //affective //state? Do subjects //like// the system?
9 +2. Does the design positively affect PwD's //affective //state?
10 10  
11 11  3. Is the design //dependable//; is the design accessible enough for PwD to rely on it? Does it feel natural?
12 12