Project homeWiki source code of 2. Socio-Cognitive Engineering
Version 7.1 by Rixt Hellinga on 2024/02/29 16:21
Show last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The issue at hand, as discussed in previous chapters, requires a combination of human and robot solutions. To design and develop such a solution we can use the Socio-Cognitive Engineering (SCE) method. SCE provides a clear structure, consisting of a foundation, specification, and evaluation. It allows us to take into account stakeholders and their values, and create claims through functions, effects, and use cases. The incremental and iterative process taken in the SCE method combines human factors and related technology to form re-usable solutions. | ||
| 2 | |||
| 3 | Generally, technology does not work in isolation (1). In the context of our problem, the robot's environment, knowledge, and goals are intertwined with that of the human. SCE allows us to combine the human and technological aspects or our problem. Each of the involved parties (the robot, the subject, the guardian) can be modeled through the SCE method. Through methods such as user stories and value stories we can create a well-rounded description of a stakeholder and their goals. The difference in for example environments, abilities, and goals are easy to map out through SCE. | ||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | what is it -> see description | ||
| 6 | |||
| 7 | why do we need it -> because robots are not in isolation | ||
| 8 | |||
| 9 | (1) Source: Week 3.1a slide 27. This Hybrid intelligence is situated (source slide 28) | ||
| 10 | |||
| 11 | **Questions to answer here:** | ||
| 12 | |||
| 13 | * Why do we use Socio-Cognitive Engineering? What are its aspect/perks and why is that applicable in our case? | ||
| 14 | * "How can the technology be designed such that the human is able to work with the technology?" - xwiki | ||
| 15 | |||
| 16 | **Short answer:** | ||
| 17 | |||
| 18 | We need an agent that takes care of some of the needs of Pwds. We cannot see these people outside of their environment and have to integrate that into our solution. so we need sce. | ||
| 19 | |||
| 20 | AI does not work in isolation. We have to integrate technology into human's work and living environment. Source: Week 3.1a slide 27. This Hybrid intelligence is situated (source slide 28). It's a combination of the agent, the human, and their environment, each of which practice self-regulation. | ||
| 21 | |||
| 22 | "Identifying the underlying motivation for an individual with dementia to engage in different activities is important for matching a person with activities that will be satisfying." (Han, A., Radel, J., McDowd, J. M., & Sabata, D. (2016). Perspectives of people with dementia about meaningful activities: a synthesis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 31(2), 115-123) So we need SCE to identify these motivations and stuff. | ||
| 23 | |||
| 24 | |||
| 25 | **More explanation:** | ||
| 26 | |||
| 27 | //SCE// | ||
| 28 | |||
| 29 | * It provides a structure to work in (see the foundation, specification, evaluation image). | ||
| 30 | * It considers multiple stakeholders and their values. | ||
| 31 | * It uses user stories and value stories. | ||
| 32 | * It is incremental and iterative. (**Cyclic Process of Progression: **Source: after Carroll (2002), Figure 3.1, p. 68.) | ||
| 33 | * It uses ontologies and design patterns. | ||
| 34 | * It uses personas and problem scenarios, and scenario-based design. | ||
| 35 | * It uses use cases, functions, effects, and claims in the specification | ||
| 36 | * It is: (source Week 3.2b - SCEmodule2b_ScenarioBasedDesign2024 slide 4) | ||
| 37 | ** Iterative incremental process | ||
| 38 | *** Quick start | ||
| 39 | *** Focused refinement of core functions and design rationale | ||
| 40 | *** Coherent specification | ||
| 41 | ** Theory and empirical driven | ||
| 42 | ** Combined operational (domain), human factors and technology perspective | ||
| 43 | ** Stakeholder involvement in design and test activities | ||
| 44 | ** Producing re-usable design specifications and implementations | ||
| 45 | |||
| 46 | //HYBRID INTELLIGENCE GROWS BY...// | ||
| 47 | |||
| 48 | * Integrating technology into the situated practice via co-design by joint task performance and co-learning: | ||
| 49 | ** Common situated objectives | ||
| 50 | ** Value-sensitive agreements | ||
| 51 | ** Shared knowledge base & experiences | ||
| 52 | ** Mutual uptake & learning by explanation & feedback | ||
| 53 | * and is grounded by | ||
| 54 | ** Ontologies of the partnership | ||
| 55 | ** Collaboration patterns | ||
| 56 | ** Value models | ||
| 57 | |||
| 58 | //What is Human Centred design?// | ||
| 59 | |||
| 60 | * Usability | ||
| 61 | ** extent to which a system, product or service can be used by specified users to achieve specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction in a specified context of use | ||
| 62 | * Effectiveness | ||
| 63 | ** accuracy and completeness with which users achieve specified goals | ||
| 64 | * Efficiency | ||
| 65 | ** resources expended in relation to the accuracy and completeness with which users achieve goals | ||
| 66 | * Satisfaction | ||
| 67 | ** freedom from discomfort and positive attitudes towards the use of the product | ||
| 68 | * Context of use | ||
| 69 | ** users, tasks, equipment (hardware, software and materials), and the physical and social environments in which a product is used | ||
| 70 | * User experience | ||
| 71 | ** person's perceptions and responses resulting from the use and/or anticipated use of a product, system or service | ||
| 72 | * Stakeholder | ||
| 73 | ** individual or organization having a right, share, claim or interest in a system or in its possession of characteristics that meet their needs and expectations | ||
| 74 | |||
| 75 |