Skip to Content

Wiki source code of 2. Socio-Cognitive Engineering

Version 4.6 by Rixt Hellinga on 2024/02/29 08:59
Hide last authors
Rixt Hellinga 2.1 1 * Why do we use Socio-Cognitive Engineering? What are its aspect/perks and why is that applicable in our case?
Rixt Hellinga 2.2 2
Rixt Hellinga 4.1 3 "How can the technology be designed such that the human is able to work with the technology?" - xwiki
4
Rixt Hellinga 2.5 5 **SCE**
Rixt Hellinga 2.2 6
Rixt Hellinga 2.5 7 AI does not work in isolation. We have to integrate technology into human's work and living environment. Source: Week 3.1a slide 27. This Hybrid intelligence is situated (source slide 28). It's a combination of the agent, the human, and their environment, each of which practice self-regulation.
8
Rixt Hellinga 4.3 9 * It provides a structure to work in (see the foundation, specification, evaluation image).
10 * It considers multiple stakeholders and their values.
11 * It uses user stories and value stories.
12 * It is incremental and iterative.
13 * It uses ontologies and design patterns.
14 * It uses use cases, functions, effects, and claims in the specification
Rixt Hellinga 4.6 15 * It is: (source Week 3.2b - SCEmodule2b_ScenarioBasedDesign2024 slide 4)
Rixt Hellinga 4.5 16 ** Iterative incremental process
17 *** Quick start
18 *** Focused refinement of core functions and design rationale
19 *** Coherent specification
20 ** Theory and empirical driven
21 ** Combined operational (domain), human factors and technology perspective
22 ** Stakeholder involvement in design and test activities
23 ** Producing re-usable design specifications and implementations
Rixt Hellinga 4.3 24
25 **HYBRID INTELLIGENCE GROWS BY...**
Rixt Hellinga 4.2 26 Integrating technology into the situated practice via co-design by joint task performance and co-learning:
Rixt Hellinga 2.5 27
Rixt Hellinga 4.2 28 * Common situated objectives
29 * Value-sensitive agreements
30 * Shared knowledge base & experiences
31 * Mutual uptake & learning by explanation & feedback
Rixt Hellinga 3.2 32
Rixt Hellinga 4.2 33 and is grounded by
34
35 * Ontologies of the partnership
36 * Collaboration patterns
37 * Value models
38
39
Rixt Hellinga 2.7 40 We need an agent that takes care of some of the needs of Pwds. We cannot see these people outside of their environment and have to integrate that into our solution. so we need sce.
Rixt Hellinga 2.5 41
Rixt Hellinga 2.6 42
Rixt Hellinga 4.4 43 "Identifying the underlying motivation for an individual with dementia to engage in different activities is important for matching a person with activities that will be satisfying.". So we need SCE to identify these motivations and stuff.
Rixt Hellinga 2.6 44
Rixt Hellinga 4.4 45 Han, A., Radel, J., McDowd, J. M., & Sabata, D. (2016). Perspectives of people with dementia about meaningful activities: a synthesis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 31(2), 115-123
46
47
Rixt Hellinga 2.2 48 What is Human Centred design?
49
50 **Usability**
51 extent to which a system, product or service can
52 be used by specified users to achieve specified
53 goals with effectiveness, efficiency and
54 satisfaction in a specified context of use
55 **Effectiveness**
56 accuracy and completeness with which users
57 achieve specified goals
58 **Efficiency**
59 resources expended in relation to the accuracy
60 and completeness with which users achieve
61 goals
62 **Satisfaction**
63 freedom from discomfort and positive attitudes
64 towards the use of the product
Rixt Hellinga 2.3 65 **Context of use**
66 users, tasks, equipment (hardware, software and
67 materials), and the physical and social
68 environments in which a product is used
69 **User experience**
70 person's perceptions and responses resulting from
71 the use and/or anticipated use of a product, system
72 or service
73 **Stakeholder**
74 individual or organization having a right, share,
75 claim or interest in a system or in its possession of
76 characteristics that meet their needs and
77 expectations
Rixt Hellinga 2.4 78
79
80
81 **Cyclic Process of Progression: **Source: after Carroll (2002), Figure 3.1, p. 68.