Changes for page 2. Socio-Cognitive Engineering

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -1,72 +1,76 @@
1		-* Why do we use Socio-Cognitive Engineering? What are its aspect/perks and why is that applicable in our case?
	1	+The issue at hand, as discussed in previous chapters, requires a combination of human and robot solutions. To design and develop such a solution we can use the Socio-Cognitive Engineering (SCE) method. SCE provides a clear structure, consisting of a foundation, specification, and evaluation. It allows us to take into account stakeholders and their values, through methods such as user stories and value stories. The incremental and iterative process taken in the SCE method combines human factors and related technology to form re-usable solutions.
2	2
3		-"How can the technology be designed such that the human is able to work with the technology?" - xwiki
	3	+Generally, technology does not work in isolation (1). In the context of our problem, the robot's environment, knowledge, and goals are intertwined with that of the human. SCE allows us to combine the human and technological aspects or our problem.
	4	+
4	4
5		-**SCE**
	6	+what is it -> see description
6	6
7		-AI does not work in isolation. We have to integrate technology into human's work and living environment. Source: Week 3.1a slide 27. This Hybrid intelligence is situated (source slide 28). It's a combination of the agent, the human, and their environment, each of which practice self-regulation.
	8	+why do we need it -> because robots are not in isolation
8	8
9		-* It provides a structure to work in (see the foundation, specification, evaluation image).
10		-* It considers multiple stakeholders and their values.
11		-* It uses user stories and value stories.
12		-* It is incremental and iterative.
13		-* It uses ontologies and design patterns.
14		-* It uses use cases, functions, effects, and claims in the specification
	10	+(1) Source: Week 3.1a slide 27. This Hybrid intelligence is situated (source slide 28)
15	15
16		-**HYBRID INTELLIGENCE GROWS BY...**
17		-Integrating technology into the situated practice via co-design by joint task performance and co-learning:
	12	+**Questions to answer here:**
18	18
19		-* Common situated objectives
20		-* Value-sensitive agreements
21		-* Shared knowledge base & experiences
22		-* Mutual uptake & learning by explanation & feedback
	14	+* Why do we use Socio-Cognitive Engineering? What are its aspect/perks and why is that applicable in our case?
	15	+* "How can the technology be designed such that the human is able to work with the technology?" - xwiki
23	23
24		-and is grounded by
	17	+**Short answer:**
25	25
26		-* Ontologies of the partnership
27		-* Collaboration patterns
28		-* Value models
	19	+We need an agent that takes care of some of the needs of Pwds. We cannot see these people outside of their environment and have to integrate that into our solution. so we need sce.
29	29
	21	+AI does not work in isolation. We have to integrate technology into human's work and living environment. Source: Week 3.1a slide 27. This Hybrid intelligence is situated (source slide 28). It's a combination of the agent, the human, and their environment, each of which practice self-regulation.
30	30
31		-We need an agent that takes care of some of the needs of Pwds. We cannot see these people outside of their environment and have to integrate that into our solution. so we need sce.
	23	+"Identifying the underlying motivation for an individual with dementia to engage in different activities is important for matching a person with activities that will be satisfying." (Han, A., Radel, J., McDowd, J. M., & Sabata, D. (2016). Perspectives of people with dementia about meaningful activities: a synthesis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 31(2), 115-123) So we need SCE to identify these motivations and stuff.
32	32
33	33
34		-"Identifying the underlying motivation for an individual with dementia to engage in different activities is important for matching a person with activities that will be satisfying.". So we need SCE to identify these motivations and stuff.
	26	+**More explanation:**
35	35
36		-Han, A., Radel, J., McDowd, J. M., & Sabata, D. (2016). Perspectives of people with dementia about meaningful activities: a synthesis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 31(2), 115-123
	28	+//SCE//
37	37
	30	+* It provides a structure to work in (see the foundation, specification, evaluation image).
	31	+* It considers multiple stakeholders and their values.
	32	+* It uses user stories and value stories.
	33	+* It is incremental and iterative. (**Cyclic Process of Progression: **Source: after Carroll (2002), Figure 3.1, p. 68.)
	34	+* It uses ontologies and design patterns.
	35	+* It uses personas and problem scenarios, and scenario-based design.
	36	+* It uses use cases, functions, effects, and claims in the specification
	37	+* It is: (source Week 3.2b - SCEmodule2b_ScenarioBasedDesign2024 slide 4)
	38	+** Iterative incremental process
	39	+*** Quick start
	40	+*** Focused refinement of core functions and design rationale
	41	+*** Coherent specification
	42	+** Theory and empirical driven
	43	+** Combined operational (domain), human factors and technology perspective
	44	+** Stakeholder involvement in design and test activities
	45	+** Producing re-usable design specifications and implementations
38	38
39		-What is Human Centred design?
	47	+//HYBRID INTELLIGENCE GROWS BY...//
40	40
41		-**Usability**
42		-extent to which a system, product or service can
43		-be used by specified users to achieve specified
44		-goals with effectiveness, efficiency and
45		-satisfaction in a specified context of use
46		-**Effectiveness**
47		-accuracy and completeness with which users
48		-achieve specified goals
49		-**Efficiency**
50		-resources expended in relation to the accuracy
51		-and completeness with which users achieve
52		-goals
53		-**Satisfaction**
54		-freedom from discomfort and positive attitudes
55		-towards the use of the product
56		-**Context of use**
57		-users, tasks, equipment (hardware, software and
58		-materials), and the physical and social
59		-environments in which a product is used
60		-**User experience**
61		-person's perceptions and responses resulting from
62		-the use and/or anticipated use of a product, system
63		-or service
64		-**Stakeholder**
65		-individual or organization having a right, share,
66		-claim or interest in a system or in its possession of
67		-characteristics that meet their needs and
68		-expectations
	49	+* Integrating technology into the situated practice via co-design by joint task performance and co-learning:
	50	+** Common situated objectives
	51	+** Value-sensitive agreements
	52	+** Shared knowledge base & experiences
	53	+** Mutual uptake & learning by explanation & feedback
	54	+* and is grounded by
	55	+** Ontologies of the partnership
	56	+** Collaboration patterns
	57	+** Value models
69	69
	59	+//What is Human Centred design?//
70	70
	61	+* Usability
	62	+** extent to which a system, product or service can be used by specified users to achieve specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction in a specified context of use
	63	+* Effectiveness
	64	+** accuracy and completeness with which users achieve specified goals
	65	+* Efficiency
	66	+** resources expended in relation to the accuracy and completeness with which users achieve goals
	67	+* Satisfaction
	68	+** freedom from discomfort and positive attitudes towards the use of the product
	69	+* Context of use
	70	+** users, tasks, equipment (hardware, software and materials), and the physical and social environments in which a product is used
	71	+* User experience
	72	+** person's perceptions and responses resulting from the use and/or anticipated use of a product, system or service
	73	+* Stakeholder
	74	+** individual or organization having a right, share, claim or interest in a system or in its possession of characteristics that meet their needs and expectations
71	71
72		-**Cyclic Process of Progression: **Source: after Carroll (2002), Figure 3.1, p. 68.
	76	+