Changes for page 2. Socio-Cognitive Engineering
Last modified by Rixt Hellinga on 2024/04/08 18:40
From version 4.4
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/02/29 08:58
on 2024/02/29 08:58
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 15.3
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/03/19 23:08
on 2024/03/19 23:08
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
-
Objects (0 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,72 +1,31 @@ 1 - *Whydo we useSocio-Cognitive Engineering? What are its aspect/perks and why is that applicable in our case?1 +//What is Socio-Cognitive Engineering// 2 2 3 - "How can the technologybe designed suchthat thehuman isable toworkwith the technology?"-xwiki3 +The issue at hand, as discussed in previous chapters, requires a combination of human and robot solutions. To design and develop such a solution we can use the Socio-Cognitive Engineering (SCE) method. SCE is a framework that among other things promotes human collaboration and learning with technology-based systems [3]. It provides a clear structure, consisting of a foundation, specification, and evaluation. It allows us to take into account stakeholders and their values, and create claims through functions, effects, and use cases. The incremental and iterative process taken in the SCE method combines human factors and related technology to form re-usable solutions. 4 4 5 - **SCE**5 +//Why do we need SCE// 6 6 7 -AI does not work in isolation. We have to integrate technology into human's work and living environment. Source: Week 3.1a slide 27. This Hybrid intelligence is situated (source slide 28). It's a combination of the agent, the human, and their environment, each of which practice self-regulation. 7 +Generally, technology does not work in isolation [1]. In the context of our problem, the robot's environment, knowledge, and goals are intertwined with that of the human. SCE allows us to combine the human and technological aspects or our problem. Within different fields of studies we can find relevant philosophies and approaches applicable to our problem. 8 +The field of User-Centered Design tells us that a stakeholder analysis is a significant part of designing solutions. It is important to map the underlying motivation and values of parties in order to understand which activities they would be drawn to. This also goes for the context of this reseach, as done by Han A [2]. Each of the involved parties (the robot, the PwD, the guardian) can be modeled through the SCE methods such as user stories and value stories, which allows us to a well-rounded description of a stakeholder and their goals. **so this helps us understand the actors and the environment** 8 8 9 -* It provides a structure to work in (see the foundation, specification, evaluation image). 10 -* It considers multiple stakeholders and their values. 11 -* It uses user stories and value stories. 12 -* It is incremental and iterative. 13 -* It uses ontologies and design patterns. 14 -* It uses use cases, functions, effects, and claims in the specification 15 15 16 -**HYBRID INTELLIGENCE GROWS BY...** 17 -Integrating technology into the situated practice via co-design by joint task performance and co-learning: 18 18 19 -* Common situated objectives 20 -* Value-sensitive agreements 21 -* Shared knowledge base & experiences 22 -* Mutual uptake & learning by explanation & feedback 12 +The computer science discipline makes creating functions and use cases more familiar. It also supplies us with nice development strategies for code. And to think crcitically about what technological features are not only possible but necessary and useful. **so this helps us understand the technology** 13 +Cognitive science helps us understand how certain behaviour is interpreted and how we can use that to reach our goal. So for example it is a benefit to have technology seem trustworthy by having it mimick human behaviour **SOURCE?.** **so this helps us understand the psychology/emotions** 23 23 24 - and isgroundedby15 + --The difference in for example environments, abilities, and goals are easy to map out through SCE.-- 25 25 26 -* Ontologies of the partnership 27 -* Collaboration patterns 28 -* Value models 17 +//Computer science// 29 29 19 +//Cognitive science// 30 30 31 - Weneed anagentthat takes care of some of the needsof Pwds. Wecannotsee these people outside of their environment and have to integrate that into our solution. so we need sce.21 +//User centerd design// 32 32 23 +[[https:~~/~~/www.researchgate.net/publication/32231480_Socio-cognitive_Engineering>>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/32231480_Socio-cognitive_Engineering]] [3] 33 33 34 - "Identifyingtheunderlying motivationfor an individual with dementia to engage in different activitiesis important for matching a person with activities that will be satisfying.". So we need SCE to identify these motivations and stuff.25 += **//References//** = 35 35 36 - Han,A., Radel,J., McDowd, J. M., & Sabata,D. (2016). Perspectives of people withdementiaabout meaningful activities: a synthesis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 31(2), 115-12327 +[1] Week 3.1a slide 27. 37 37 29 +[2] Han, A., Radel, J., McDowd, J. M., & Sabata, D. (2016). Perspectives of people with dementia about meaningful activities: a synthesis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 31(2), 115-123) 38 38 39 -What is Human Centred design? 40 - 41 -**Usability** 42 -extent to which a system, product or service can 43 -be used by specified users to achieve specified 44 -goals with effectiveness, efficiency and 45 -satisfaction in a specified context of use 46 -**Effectiveness** 47 -accuracy and completeness with which users 48 -achieve specified goals 49 -**Efficiency** 50 -resources expended in relation to the accuracy 51 -and completeness with which users achieve 52 -goals 53 -**Satisfaction** 54 -freedom from discomfort and positive attitudes 55 -towards the use of the product 56 -**Context of use** 57 -users, tasks, equipment (hardware, software and 58 -materials), and the physical and social 59 -environments in which a product is used 60 -**User experience** 61 -person's perceptions and responses resulting from 62 -the use and/or anticipated use of a product, system 63 -or service 64 -**Stakeholder** 65 -individual or organization having a right, share, 66 -claim or interest in a system or in its possession of 67 -characteristics that meet their needs and 68 -expectations 69 - 70 - 71 - 72 -**Cyclic Process of Progression: **Source: after Carroll (2002), Figure 3.1, p. 68. 31 +
- XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +xwiki:XWiki.MarkNeerincx - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Maybe you can add something on the integration of disciplines and distributed R&D activities? - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2024-03-18 15:53:47.866