Skip to Content
Last modified by Rixt Hellinga on 2024/04/08 18:40
From version 3.6
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/02/29 08:42
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 15.2
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/03/19 22:53
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,47 +1,23 @@
1 -* Why do we use Socio-Cognitive Engineering? What are its aspect/perks and why is that applicable in our case?
1 +The issue at hand, as discussed in previous chapters, requires a combination of human and robot solutions. To design and develop such a solution we can use the Socio-Cognitive Engineering (SCE) method. SCE is a framework that among other things promotes human collaboration and learning with technology-based systems [3].
2 2  
3 -**SCE**
3 +It provides a clear structure, consisting of a foundation, specification, and evaluation. It allows us to take into account stakeholders and their values, and create claims through functions, effects, and use cases. The incremental and iterative process taken in the SCE method combines human factors and related technology to form re-usable solutions.
4 4  
5 -AI does not work in isolation. We have to integrate technology into human's work and living environment. Source: Week 3.1a slide 27. This Hybrid intelligence is situated (source slide 28). It's a combination of the agent, the human, and their environment, each of which practice self-regulation.
5 +Generally, technology does not work in isolation [1]. In the context of our problem, the robot's environment, knowledge, and goals are intertwined with that of the human. SCE allows us to combine the human and technological aspects or our problem. Within different fields of studies we can find relevant philosophies and approaches applicable to our problem.
6 6  
7 -It provides a structure to work in (see the foundation, specification, evaluation image). It considers multiple stakeholders and their values.
7 +According to [2] it is important to map the underlying motivation of parties in order to understand which activities they would be drawn to. Each of the involved parties (the robot, the PwD, the guardian) can be modeled through the SCE method. Through methods such as user stories and value stories we can create a well-rounded description of a stakeholder and their goals. --The difference in for example environments, abilities, and goals are easy to map out through SCE.--
8 8  
9 +//Computer science//
9 9  
10 -We need an agent that takes care of some of the needs of Pwds. We cannot see these people outside of their environment and have to integrate that into our solution. so we need sce.
11 +//Cognitive science//
11 11  
13 +//User centerd design//
12 12  
15 +[[https:~~/~~/www.researchgate.net/publication/32231480_Socio-cognitive_Engineering>>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/32231480_Socio-cognitive_Engineering]] [3]
13 13  
14 -What is Human Centred design?
17 += **//References//** =
15 15  
16 -**Usability**
17 -extent to which a system, product or service can
18 -be used by specified users to achieve specified
19 -goals with effectiveness, efficiency and
20 -satisfaction in a specified context of use
21 -**Effectiveness**
22 -accuracy and completeness with which users
23 -achieve specified goals
24 -**Efficiency**
25 -resources expended in relation to the accuracy
26 -and completeness with which users achieve
27 -goals
28 -**Satisfaction**
29 -freedom from discomfort and positive attitudes
30 -towards the use of the product
31 -**Context of use**
32 -users, tasks, equipment (hardware, software and
33 -materials), and the physical and social
34 -environments in which a product is used
35 -**User experience**
36 -person's perceptions and responses resulting from
37 -the use and/or anticipated use of a product, system
38 -or service
39 -**Stakeholder**
40 -individual or organization having a right, share,
41 -claim or interest in a system or in its possession of
42 -characteristics that meet their needs and
43 -expectations
19 +[1] Week 3.1a slide 27.
44 44  
21 +[2] Han, A., Radel, J., McDowd, J. M., & Sabata, D. (2016). Perspectives of people with dementia about meaningful activities: a synthesis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 31(2), 115-123)
45 45  
46 -
47 -**Cyclic Process of Progression: **Source: after Carroll (2002), Figure 3.1, p. 68.
23 +
XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +xwiki:XWiki.MarkNeerincx
Comment
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Maybe you can add something on the integration of disciplines and distributed R&D activities?
Date
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2024-03-18 15:53:47.866