Last modified by Rixt Hellinga on 2024/04/08 18:40

From version 3.3
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/02/29 08:37
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 2.2
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/02/29 08:24
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,20 +1,6 @@
1 1  * Why do we use Socio-Cognitive Engineering? What are its aspect/perks and why is that applicable in our case?
2 2  
3 -**SCE**
4 4  
5 -AI does not work in isolation. We have to integrate technology into human's work and living environment. Source: Week 3.1a slide 27. This Hybrid intelligence is situated (source slide 28). It's a combination of the agent, the human, and their environment, each of which practice self-regulation.
6 -
7 -It considers multiple stakeholders and their values.
8 -
9 -We can use the following as a design pattern?
10 -
11 -Basic Human Values Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 11.
12 -
13 -
14 -We need an agent that takes care of some of the needs of Pwds. We cannot see these people outside of their environment and have to integrate that into our solution. so we need sce.
15 -
16 -
17 -
18 18  What is Human Centred design?
19 19  
20 20  **Usability**
... ... @@ -32,20 +32,3 @@
32 32  **Satisfaction**
33 33  freedom from discomfort and positive attitudes
34 34  towards the use of the product
35 -**Context of use**
36 -users, tasks, equipment (hardware, software and
37 -materials), and the physical and social
38 -environments in which a product is used
39 -**User experience**
40 -person's perceptions and responses resulting from
41 -the use and/or anticipated use of a product, system
42 -or service
43 -**Stakeholder**
44 -individual or organization having a right, share,
45 -claim or interest in a system or in its possession of
46 -characteristics that meet their needs and
47 -expectations
48 -
49 -
50 -
51 -**Cyclic Process of Progression: **Source: after Carroll (2002), Figure 3.1, p. 68.