Skip to Content
Last modified by Rixt Hellinga on 2024/04/08 18:40
From version 3.2
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/02/29 08:37
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 16.1
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/03/19 23:22
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,51 +1,26 @@
1 -* Why do we use Socio-Cognitive Engineering? What are its aspect/perks and why is that applicable in our case?
1 +//What is Socio-Cognitive Engineering//
2 2  
3 -**SCE**
3 +The issue at hand, as discussed in previous chapters, requires a combination of human and robot solutions. To design and develop such a solution we can use the Socio-Cognitive Engineering (SCE) method. SCE is a framework that among other things promotes human collaboration and learning with technology-based systems [3]. It provides a clear structure, consisting of a foundation, specification, and evaluation. It allows us to take into account stakeholders and their values, and create claims through functions, effects, and use cases. The incremental and iterative process taken in the SCE method combines human factors and related technology to form re-usable solutions.
4 4  
5 -AI does not work in isolation. We have to integrate technology into human's work and living environment. Source: Week 3.1a slide 27. This Hybrid intelligence is situated (source slide 28). It's a combination of the agent, the human, and their environment, each of which practice self-regulation.
5 +//Why do we need SCE//
6 6  
7 -It considers multiple stakeholders and their values.
7 +Generally, technology does not work in isolation [1]. In the context of our problem, the robot's environment, knowledge, and goals are intertwined with that of the human. SCE allows us to combine the human and technological aspects or our problem. Within different fields of studies we can find relevant philosophies and approaches applicable to our problem.
8 +The field of User-Centered Design tells us that a stakeholder analysis is a significant part of designing solutions. It is important to map the underlying motivation and values of parties in order to understand which activities they would be drawn to. This also goes for the context of this reseach, as done by Han A [2]. Each of the involved parties (the robot, the PwD, the guardian) can be modeled through the SCE methods such as user stories and value stories, which allows us to a well-rounded description of a stakeholder and their goals.
8 8  
9 -We can use the following as a design pattern?
10 +In the computer science field creating functions (or requirements) as part of the design process is very common. Computer science also knows many different code development strategies. This field requires the developers to critically think about not only what technological features are possible but also which ones are necessary and useful. It gives us a better perspective of the technological side of the problem.
11 +The fields of cognitive science and human-robot interaction help us understand how certain robot and human behaviour is interpreted by users and how those interpretations can be used that to achieve a certain goal. It would for example be beneficial to develop a technology that seems trustworthy by having it mimic human behaviour [4] [5]. These fields help us utilize human reactions in order to create a better solution to our problem.
12 +As is clear now, multiple sciences are necessary for providing a clear perspective on the possible solutions to our problem. Socio-Cognitive Engineering allows us to combine the methods found in those fields into an interdisciplinary process of development.
10 10  
11 -Basic Human Values Value Sensitive Design Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 11.
14 += **//References//** =
12 12  
16 +[1] Week 3.1a slide 27.
13 13  
14 -We need an agent that takes care of some of the needs of Pwds. We cannot see these people outside of their environment and have to integrate that into our solution. so we need sce.
18 +[2] Han, A., Radel, J., McDowd, J. M., & Sabata, D. (2016). Perspectives of people with dementia about meaningful activities: a synthesis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 31(2), 115-123)
15 15  
20 +[3] Sharples, Mike. (2006). Socio-cognitive Engineering. Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction. 10.4018/978-1-59140-562-7.ch080.
16 16  
22 +[4] Fiorini, L. Advancement on Human-Robot Interaction: Perception, Cognitive Architecture and Field Tests. //Int J of Soc Robotics// **15**, 369–370 (2023). [[https:~~/~~/doi.org/10.1007/s12369-022-00953-3>>https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-022-00953-3]]
17 17  
18 -What is Human Centred design?
24 +[5] Shimada, Michihiro & Yamauchi, Kazunori & Ishiguro, Hiroshi & Itakura, Shoji. (2008). Studying the Influence of the Chameleon Effect on Humans using an Android. 767-772. 10.1109/IROS.2008.4650853.
19 19  
20 -**Usability**
21 -extent to which a system, product or service can
22 -be used by specified users to achieve specified
23 -goals with effectiveness, efficiency and
24 -satisfaction in a specified context of use
25 -**Effectiveness**
26 -accuracy and completeness with which users
27 -achieve specified goals
28 -**Efficiency**
29 -resources expended in relation to the accuracy
30 -and completeness with which users achieve
31 -goals
32 -**Satisfaction**
33 -freedom from discomfort and positive attitudes
34 -towards the use of the product
35 -**Context of use**
36 -users, tasks, equipment (hardware, software and
37 -materials), and the physical and social
38 -environments in which a product is used
39 -**User experience**
40 -person's perceptions and responses resulting from
41 -the use and/or anticipated use of a product, system
42 -or service
43 -**Stakeholder**
44 -individual or organization having a right, share,
45 -claim or interest in a system or in its possession of
46 -characteristics that meet their needs and
47 -expectations
48 -
49 -
50 -
51 -**Cyclic Process of Progression: **Source: after Carroll (2002), Figure 3.1, p. 68.
26 +
XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +xwiki:XWiki.MarkNeerincx
Comment
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Maybe you can add something on the integration of disciplines and distributed R&D activities?
Date
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2024-03-18 15:53:47.866