Changes for page 2. Socio-Cognitive Engineering
Last modified by Rixt Hellinga on 2024/04/08 18:40
From version 3.2
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/02/29 08:37
on 2024/02/29 08:37
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 14.1
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/03/15 17:25
on 2024/03/15 17:25
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,51 +1,11 @@ 1 - *Whydo we use Socio-Cognitive Engineering?Whatare its aspect/perks andwhyis that applicable in ourcase?1 +The issue at hand, as discussed in previous chapters, requires a combination of human and robot solutions. To design and develop such a solution we can use the Socio-Cognitive Engineering (SCE) method. SCE provides a clear structure, consisting of a foundation, specification, and evaluation. It allows us to take into account stakeholders and their values, and create claims through functions, effects, and use cases. The incremental and iterative process taken in the SCE method combines human factors and related technology to form re-usable solutions. 2 2 3 - **SCE**3 +Generally, technology does not work in isolation [1]. In the context of our problem, the robot's environment, knowledge, and goals are intertwined with that of the human. SCE allows us to combine the human and technological aspects or our problem. According to [2] it is important to map the underlying motivation of parties in order to understand which activities they would be drawn to. Each of the involved parties (the robot, the subject, the guardian) can be modeled through the SCE method. Through methods such as user stories and value stories we can create a well-rounded description of a stakeholder and their goals. The difference in for example environments, abilities, and goals are easy to map out through SCE. 4 4 5 - AIdoes not work in isolation. We have to integrate technology into human's work and living environment. Source: Week 3.1a slide 27. This Hybrid intelligence is situated (source slide 28). It's a combination oftheagent, the human, and theirenvironment, each of which practiceself-regulation.5 += **//References//** = 6 6 7 - Itconsiders multiplestakeholdersandtheir values.7 +[1] Week 3.1a slide 27. 8 8 9 - We canusethe following as adesignpattern?9 +[2] Han, A., Radel, J., McDowd, J. M., & Sabata, D. (2016). Perspectives of people with dementia about meaningful activities: a synthesis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 31(2), 115-123) 10 10 11 -Basic Human Values Value Sensitive Design Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 11. 12 - 13 - 14 -We need an agent that takes care of some of the needs of Pwds. We cannot see these people outside of their environment and have to integrate that into our solution. so we need sce. 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 -What is Human Centred design? 19 - 20 -**Usability** 21 -extent to which a system, product or service can 22 -be used by specified users to achieve specified 23 -goals with effectiveness, efficiency and 24 -satisfaction in a specified context of use 25 -**Effectiveness** 26 -accuracy and completeness with which users 27 -achieve specified goals 28 -**Efficiency** 29 -resources expended in relation to the accuracy 30 -and completeness with which users achieve 31 -goals 32 -**Satisfaction** 33 -freedom from discomfort and positive attitudes 34 -towards the use of the product 35 -**Context of use** 36 -users, tasks, equipment (hardware, software and 37 -materials), and the physical and social 38 -environments in which a product is used 39 -**User experience** 40 -person's perceptions and responses resulting from 41 -the use and/or anticipated use of a product, system 42 -or service 43 -**Stakeholder** 44 -individual or organization having a right, share, 45 -claim or interest in a system or in its possession of 46 -characteristics that meet their needs and 47 -expectations 48 - 49 - 50 - 51 -**Cyclic Process of Progression: **Source: after Carroll (2002), Figure 3.1, p. 68. 11 +