Changes for page 2. Socio-Cognitive Engineering
Last modified by Rixt Hellinga on 2024/04/08 18:40
From version 3.1
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/02/29 08:32
on 2024/02/29 08:32
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 14.1
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/03/15 17:25
on 2024/03/15 17:25
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,45 +1,11 @@ 1 - *Whydo we use Socio-Cognitive Engineering?Whatare its aspect/perks andwhyis that applicable in ourcase?1 +The issue at hand, as discussed in previous chapters, requires a combination of human and robot solutions. To design and develop such a solution we can use the Socio-Cognitive Engineering (SCE) method. SCE provides a clear structure, consisting of a foundation, specification, and evaluation. It allows us to take into account stakeholders and their values, and create claims through functions, effects, and use cases. The incremental and iterative process taken in the SCE method combines human factors and related technology to form re-usable solutions. 2 2 3 - **SCE**3 +Generally, technology does not work in isolation [1]. In the context of our problem, the robot's environment, knowledge, and goals are intertwined with that of the human. SCE allows us to combine the human and technological aspects or our problem. According to [2] it is important to map the underlying motivation of parties in order to understand which activities they would be drawn to. Each of the involved parties (the robot, the subject, the guardian) can be modeled through the SCE method. Through methods such as user stories and value stories we can create a well-rounded description of a stakeholder and their goals. The difference in for example environments, abilities, and goals are easy to map out through SCE. 4 4 5 - AIdoes not work in isolation. We have to integrate technology into human's work and living environment. Source: Week 3.1a slide 27. This Hybrid intelligence is situated (source slide 28). It's a combination oftheagent, the human, and theirenvironment, each of which practiceself-regulation.5 += **//References//** = 6 6 7 +[1] Week 3.1a slide 27. 7 7 8 - Weneedanagentthat takescareofsomeoftheneedsofPwds. Wecannotsee thesepeopleoutside oftheirenvironmentandhave to integratethat intooursolution.soweneedsce.9 +[2] Han, A., Radel, J., McDowd, J. M., & Sabata, D. (2016). Perspectives of people with dementia about meaningful activities: a synthesis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 31(2), 115-123) 9 9 10 - 11 - 12 -What is Human Centred design? 13 - 14 -**Usability** 15 -extent to which a system, product or service can 16 -be used by specified users to achieve specified 17 -goals with effectiveness, efficiency and 18 -satisfaction in a specified context of use 19 -**Effectiveness** 20 -accuracy and completeness with which users 21 -achieve specified goals 22 -**Efficiency** 23 -resources expended in relation to the accuracy 24 -and completeness with which users achieve 25 -goals 26 -**Satisfaction** 27 -freedom from discomfort and positive attitudes 28 -towards the use of the product 29 -**Context of use** 30 -users, tasks, equipment (hardware, software and 31 -materials), and the physical and social 32 -environments in which a product is used 33 -**User experience** 34 -person's perceptions and responses resulting from 35 -the use and/or anticipated use of a product, system 36 -or service 37 -**Stakeholder** 38 -individual or organization having a right, share, 39 -claim or interest in a system or in its possession of 40 -characteristics that meet their needs and 41 -expectations 42 - 43 - 44 - 45 -**Cyclic Process of Progression: **Source: after Carroll (2002), Figure 3.1, p. 68. 11 +