Changes for page 2. Socio-Cognitive Engineering

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -1,45 +1,69 @@
	1	+The issue at hand, as discussed in previous chapters, requires a combination of human and robot solutions. To design and develop such a solution we can use the Socio-Cognitive Engineering (SCE) method. SCE provides a clear structure, consisting of a foundation, specification, and evaluation. It allows us to take into account stakeholders and their values, and create claims through functions, effects, and use cases. The incremental and iterative process taken in the SCE method combines human factors and related technology to form re-usable solutions.
	2	+
	3	+Generally, technology does not work in isolation [1]. In the context of our problem, the robot's environment, knowledge, and goals are intertwined with that of the human. SCE allows us to combine the human and technological aspects or our problem. According to [2] it is important to map the underlying motivation of parties in order to understand which activities they would be drawn to. Each of the involved parties (the robot, the subject, the guardian) can be modeled through the SCE method. Through methods such as user stories and value stories we can create a well-rounded description of a stakeholder and their goals. The difference in for example environments, abilities, and goals are easy to map out through SCE.
	4	+
	5	+
	6	+**Questions to answer here:**
	7	+
1	1	* Why do we use Socio-Cognitive Engineering? What are its aspect/perks and why is that applicable in our case?
	9	+* "How can the technology be designed such that the human is able to work with the technology?" - xwiki
2	2
3		-**SCE**
	11	+**More explanation:**
4	4
5		-AI does not work in isolation. We have to integrate technology into human's work and living environment. Source: Week 3.1a slide 27. This Hybrid intelligence is situated (source slide 28). It's a combination of the agent, the human, and their environment, each of which practice self-regulation.
	13	+//SCE//
6	6
	15	+* It provides a structure to work in (see the foundation, specification, evaluation image).
	16	+* It considers multiple stakeholders and their values.
	17	+* It uses user stories and value stories.
	18	+* It is incremental and iterative. (**Cyclic Process of Progression: **Source: after Carroll (2002), Figure 3.1, p. 68.)
	19	+* It uses ontologies and design patterns.
	20	+* It uses personas and problem scenarios, and scenario-based design.
	21	+* It uses use cases, functions, effects, and claims in the specification
	22	+* It is: (source Week 3.2b - SCEmodule2b_ScenarioBasedDesign2024 slide 4)
	23	+** Iterative incremental process
	24	+*** Quick start
	25	+*** Focused refinement of core functions and design rationale
	26	+*** Coherent specification
	27	+** Theory and empirical driven
	28	+** Combined operational (domain), human factors and technology perspective
	29	+** Stakeholder involvement in design and test activities
	30	+** Producing re-usable design specifications and implementations
7	7
8		-We need an agent that takes care of some of the needs of Pwds. We cannot see these people outside of their environment and have to integrate that into our solution. so we need sce.
	32	+//HYBRID INTELLIGENCE GROWS BY...//
9	9
	34	+* Integrating technology into the situated practice via co-design by joint task performance and co-learning:
	35	+** Common situated objectives
	36	+** Value-sensitive agreements
	37	+** Shared knowledge base & experiences
	38	+** Mutual uptake & learning by explanation & feedback
	39	+* and is grounded by
	40	+** Ontologies of the partnership
	41	+** Collaboration patterns
	42	+** Value models
10	10
	44	+//What is Human Centred design?//
11	11
12		-What is Human Centred design?
	46	+* Usability
	47	+** extent to which a system, product or service can be used by specified users to achieve specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction in a specified context of use
	48	+* Effectiveness
	49	+** accuracy and completeness with which users achieve specified goals
	50	+* Efficiency
	51	+** resources expended in relation to the accuracy and completeness with which users achieve goals
	52	+* Satisfaction
	53	+** freedom from discomfort and positive attitudes towards the use of the product
	54	+* Context of use
	55	+** users, tasks, equipment (hardware, software and materials), and the physical and social environments in which a product is used
	56	+* User experience
	57	+** person's perceptions and responses resulting from the use and/or anticipated use of a product, system or service
	58	+* Stakeholder
	59	+** individual or organization having a right, share, claim or interest in a system or in its possession of characteristics that meet their needs and expectations
13	13
14		-**Usability**
15		-extent to which a system, product or service can
16		-be used by specified users to achieve specified
17		-goals with effectiveness, efficiency and
18		-satisfaction in a specified context of use
19		-**Effectiveness**
20		-accuracy and completeness with which users
21		-achieve specified goals
22		-**Efficiency**
23		-resources expended in relation to the accuracy
24		-and completeness with which users achieve
25		-goals
26		-**Satisfaction**
27		-freedom from discomfort and positive attitudes
28		-towards the use of the product
29		-**Context of use**
30		-users, tasks, equipment (hardware, software and
31		-materials), and the physical and social
32		-environments in which a product is used
33		-**User experience**
34		-person's perceptions and responses resulting from
35		-the use and/or anticipated use of a product, system
36		-or service
37		-**Stakeholder**
38		-individual or organization having a right, share,
39		-claim or interest in a system or in its possession of
40		-characteristics that meet their needs and
41		-expectations
42	42
43	43
	63	+= **//References//** =
44	44
45		-**Cyclic Process of Progression: **Source: after Carroll (2002), Figure 3.1, p. 68.
	65	+[1] Week 3.1a slide 27.
	66	+
	67	+[2] Han, A., Radel, J., McDowd, J. M., & Sabata, D. (2016). Perspectives of people with dementia about meaningful activities: a synthesis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 31(2), 115-123)
	68	+
	69	+