Last modified by Rixt Hellinga on 2024/04/08 18:40

From version 2.1
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/02/29 08:13
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 2.6
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/02/29 08:30
Change comment: (Autosaved)

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,45 @@
1 1  * Why do we use Socio-Cognitive Engineering? What are its aspect/perks and why is that applicable in our case?
2 +
3 +**SCE**
4 +
5 +AI does not work in isolation. We have to integrate technology into human's work and living environment. Source: Week 3.1a slide 27. This Hybrid intelligence is situated (source slide 28). It's a combination of the agent, the human, and their environment, each of which practice self-regulation.
6 +
7 +
8 +We need an agent that takes care of some of the needs of Pwds. We cannot see these people outside of their environment
9 +
10 +
11 +
12 +What is Human Centred design?
13 +
14 +**Usability**
15 +extent to which a system, product or service can
16 +be used by specified users to achieve specified
17 +goals with effectiveness, efficiency and
18 +satisfaction in a specified context of use
19 +**Effectiveness**
20 +accuracy and completeness with which users
21 +achieve specified goals
22 +**Efficiency**
23 +resources expended in relation to the accuracy
24 +and completeness with which users achieve
25 +goals
26 +**Satisfaction**
27 +freedom from discomfort and positive attitudes
28 +towards the use of the product
29 +**Context of use**
30 +users, tasks, equipment (hardware, software and
31 +materials), and the physical and social
32 +environments in which a product is used
33 +**User experience**
34 +person's perceptions and responses resulting from
35 +the use and/or anticipated use of a product, system
36 +or service
37 +**Stakeholder**
38 +individual or organization having a right, share,
39 +claim or interest in a system or in its possession of
40 +characteristics that meet their needs and
41 +expectations
42 +
43 +
44 +
45 +**Cyclic Process of Progression: **Source: after Carroll (2002), Figure 3.1, p. 68.