Changes for page 2. Socio-Cognitive Engineering

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • XWiki.XWikiComments[0]

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -1,23 +1,68 @@
1		-The issue at hand, as discussed in previous chapters, requires a combination of human and robot solutions. To design and develop such a solution we can use the Socio-Cognitive Engineering (SCE) method. SCE is a framework that among other things promotes human collaboration and learning with technology-based systems [3].
	1	+* Why do we use Socio-Cognitive Engineering? What are its aspect/perks and why is that applicable in our case?
2	2
3		-It provides a clear structure, consisting of a foundation, specification, and evaluation. It allows us to take into account stakeholders and their values, and create claims through functions, effects, and use cases. The incremental and iterative process taken in the SCE method combines human factors and related technology to form re-usable solutions.
	3	+"How can the technology be designed such that the human is able to work with the technology?" - xwiki
4	4
5		-Generally, technology does not work in isolation [1]. In the context of our problem, the robot's environment, knowledge, and goals are intertwined with that of the human. SCE allows us to combine the human and technological aspects or our problem. Within different fields of studies we can find relevant philosophies and approaches applicable to our problem.
	5	+**SCE**
6	6
7		-According to [2] it is important to map the underlying motivation of parties in order to understand which activities they would be drawn to. Each of the involved parties (the robot, the PwD, the guardian) can be modeled through the SCE method. Through methods such as user stories and value stories we can create a well-rounded description of a stakeholder and their goals. --The difference in for example environments, abilities, and goals are easy to map out through SCE.--
	7	+AI does not work in isolation. We have to integrate technology into human's work and living environment. Source: Week 3.1a slide 27. This Hybrid intelligence is situated (source slide 28). It's a combination of the agent, the human, and their environment, each of which practice self-regulation.
8	8
9		-//Computer science//
	9	+* It provides a structure to work in (see the foundation, specification, evaluation image).
	10	+* It considers multiple stakeholders and their values.
	11	+* It uses user stories and value stories.
	12	+* It is incremental and iterative.
	13	+* It uses ontologies and design patterns.
	14	+* It uses use cases, functions, effects, and claims in the specification
10	10
11		-//Cognitive science//
	16	+**HYBRID INTELLIGENCE GROWS BY...**
	17	+Integrating technology into the situated practice via co-design by joint task performance and co-learning:
12	12
13		-//User centerd design//
	19	+* Common situated objectives
	20	+* Value-sensitive agreements
	21	+* Shared knowledge base & experiences
	22	+* Mutual uptake & learning by explanation & feedback
14	14
15		-[[https:~~/~~/www.researchgate.net/publication/32231480_Socio-cognitive_Engineering>>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/32231480_Socio-cognitive_Engineering]] [3]
	24	+and is grounded by
16	16
17		-= **//References//** =
	26	+* Ontologies of the partnership
	27	+* Collaboration patterns
	28	+* Value models
18	18
19		-[1] Week 3.1a slide 27.
20	20
21		-[2] Han, A., Radel, J., McDowd, J. M., & Sabata, D. (2016). Perspectives of people with dementia about meaningful activities: a synthesis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 31(2), 115-123)
	31	+We need an agent that takes care of some of the needs of Pwds. We cannot see these people outside of their environment and have to integrate that into our solution. so we need sce.
22	22
23		-
	33	+
	34	+
	35	+What is Human Centred design?
	36	+
	37	+**Usability**
	38	+extent to which a system, product or service can
	39	+be used by specified users to achieve specified
	40	+goals with effectiveness, efficiency and
	41	+satisfaction in a specified context of use
	42	+**Effectiveness**
	43	+accuracy and completeness with which users
	44	+achieve specified goals
	45	+**Efficiency**
	46	+resources expended in relation to the accuracy
	47	+and completeness with which users achieve
	48	+goals
	49	+**Satisfaction**
	50	+freedom from discomfort and positive attitudes
	51	+towards the use of the product
	52	+**Context of use**
	53	+users, tasks, equipment (hardware, software and
	54	+materials), and the physical and social
	55	+environments in which a product is used
	56	+**User experience**
	57	+person's perceptions and responses resulting from
	58	+the use and/or anticipated use of a product, system
	59	+or service
	60	+**Stakeholder**
	61	+individual or organization having a right, share,
	62	+claim or interest in a system or in its possession of
	63	+characteristics that meet their needs and
	64	+expectations
	65	+
	66	+
	67	+
	68	+**Cyclic Process of Progression: **Source: after Carroll (2002), Figure 3.1, p. 68.

XWiki.XWikiComments[0]

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-xwiki:XWiki.MarkNeerincx

Comment

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Maybe you can add something on the integration of disciplines and distributed R&D activities?

Date

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2024-03-18 15:53:47.866