Changes for page 2. Socio-Cognitive Engineering
Last modified by Rixt Hellinga on 2024/04/08 18:40
From version 15.2
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/03/19 22:53
on 2024/03/19 22:53
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 4.2
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/02/29 08:55
on 2024/02/29 08:55
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
-
Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,23 +1,69 @@ 1 - Theissue athand,asdiscussed in previouschapters, requires a combination of human and robot solutions. To design and develop such a solutionwecanusetheSocio-Cognitive Engineering(SCE)method.SCEis aframeworkthat amongotherthingspromoteshumancollaborationandlearningwithtechnology-based systems [3].1 +* Why do we use Socio-Cognitive Engineering? What are its aspect/perks and why is that applicable in our case? 2 2 3 - It providesaclearstructure,consistingof a foundation,specification,andevaluation.It allowsus to take into accountstakeholdersandtheirvalues,andcreate claimsthrough functions, effects,and use cases. The incrementaland iterativeprocesstakenintheSCE method combineshuman factors and related technologyto form re-usablesolutions.3 +"How can the technology be designed such that the human is able to work with the technology?" - xwiki 4 4 5 - Generally, technology does not work in isolation [1]. In the context of our problem, the robot's environment, knowledge, and goals are intertwined with that of the human.SCEallows us to combine the human and technological aspects or our problem. Within different fields of studies we can find relevant philosophies and approaches applicable to our problem.5 +**SCE** 6 6 7 -A ccordingto[2] it isimportant tomaptheunderlyingmotivationofpartiesin ordertounderstand which activitiesthey wouldbe drawnto.Each ofthe involvedparties(therobot, thePwD,theguardian)can bemodeledthroughtheSCE method. Through methodssuch as userstories and valuestorieswe can createa well-roundeddescription ofa stakeholderandtheirgoals.--Thedifferencein forexample environments,abilities,andgoalsare easytomap out through SCE.--7 +AI does not work in isolation. We have to integrate technology into human's work and living environment. Source: Week 3.1a slide 27. This Hybrid intelligence is situated (source slide 28). It's a combination of the agent, the human, and their environment, each of which practice self-regulation. 8 8 9 -//Computer science// 9 +HYBRID INTELLIGENCE GROWS BY... 10 +Integrating technology into the situated practice via co-design by joint task performance and co-learning: 10 10 11 -//Cognitive science// 12 +* Common situated objectives 13 +* Value-sensitive agreements 14 +* Shared knowledge base & experiences 15 +* Mutual uptake & learning by explanation & feedback 12 12 13 - //User centerddesign//17 +and is grounded by 14 14 15 -[[https:~~/~~/www.researchgate.net/publication/32231480_Socio-cognitive_Engineering>>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/32231480_Socio-cognitive_Engineering]] [3] 19 +* Ontologies of the partnership 20 +* Collaboration patterns 21 +* Value models 16 16 17 -= **//References//** = 18 18 19 -[1] Week 3.1a slide 27. 24 +* It provides a structure to work in (see the foundation, specification, evaluation image). 25 +* It considers multiple stakeholders and their values. 26 +* It uses user stories and value stories. 27 +* It is incremental and iterative. 28 +* It uses ontologies and design patterns. 29 +* It uses use cases, functions, effects, and claims in the specification 20 20 21 -[2] Han, A., Radel, J., McDowd, J. M., & Sabata, D. (2016). Perspectives of people with dementia about meaningful activities: a synthesis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 31(2), 115-123) 22 22 23 - 32 +We need an agent that takes care of some of the needs of Pwds. We cannot see these people outside of their environment and have to integrate that into our solution. so we need sce. 33 + 34 + 35 + 36 +What is Human Centred design? 37 + 38 +**Usability** 39 +extent to which a system, product or service can 40 +be used by specified users to achieve specified 41 +goals with effectiveness, efficiency and 42 +satisfaction in a specified context of use 43 +**Effectiveness** 44 +accuracy and completeness with which users 45 +achieve specified goals 46 +**Efficiency** 47 +resources expended in relation to the accuracy 48 +and completeness with which users achieve 49 +goals 50 +**Satisfaction** 51 +freedom from discomfort and positive attitudes 52 +towards the use of the product 53 +**Context of use** 54 +users, tasks, equipment (hardware, software and 55 +materials), and the physical and social 56 +environments in which a product is used 57 +**User experience** 58 +person's perceptions and responses resulting from 59 +the use and/or anticipated use of a product, system 60 +or service 61 +**Stakeholder** 62 +individual or organization having a right, share, 63 +claim or interest in a system or in its possession of 64 +characteristics that meet their needs and 65 +expectations 66 + 67 + 68 + 69 +**Cyclic Process of Progression: **Source: after Carroll (2002), Figure 3.1, p. 68.
- XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -xwiki:XWiki.MarkNeerincx - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Maybe you can add something on the integration of disciplines and distributed R&D activities? - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2024-03-18 15:53:47.866