Changes for page 2. Socio-Cognitive Engineering
Last modified by Rixt Hellinga on 2024/04/08 18:40
From version 13.1
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/03/15 17:24
on 2024/03/15 17:24
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 4.9
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/02/29 09:08
on 2024/02/29 09:08
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,13 +6,17 @@ 1 -The issue at hand, as discussed in previous chapters, requires a combination of human and robot solutions. To design and develop such a solution we can use the Socio-Cognitive Engineering (SCE) method. SCE provides a clear structure, consisting of a foundation, specification, and evaluation. It allows us to take into account stakeholders and their values, and create claims through functions, effects, and use cases. The incremental and iterative process taken in the SCE method combines human factors and related technology to form re-usable solutions. 2 - 3 -Generally, technology does not work in isolation [1]. In the context of our problem, the robot's environment, knowledge, and goals are intertwined with that of the human. SCE allows us to combine the human and technological aspects or our problem. According to [2] it is important to map the underlying motivation of parties in order to understand which activities they would be drawn to. Each of the involved parties (the robot, the subject, the guardian) can be modeled through the SCE method. Through methods such as user stories and value stories we can create a well-rounded description of a stakeholder and their goals. The difference in for example environments, abilities, and goals are easy to map out through SCE. 4 - 5 - 6 6 **Questions to answer here:** 7 7 8 8 * Why do we use Socio-Cognitive Engineering? What are its aspect/perks and why is that applicable in our case? 9 9 * "How can the technology be designed such that the human is able to work with the technology?" - xwiki 10 10 6 +**Short answer:** 7 + 8 +We need an agent that takes care of some of the needs of Pwds. We cannot see these people outside of their environment and have to integrate that into our solution. so we need sce. 9 + 10 +AI does not work in isolation. We have to integrate technology into human's work and living environment. Source: Week 3.1a slide 27. This Hybrid intelligence is situated (source slide 28). It's a combination of the agent, the human, and their environment, each of which practice self-regulation. 11 + 12 +"Identifying the underlying motivation for an individual with dementia to engage in different activities is important for matching a person with activities that will be satisfying." (Han, A., Radel, J., McDowd, J. M., & Sabata, D. (2016). Perspectives of people with dementia about meaningful activities: a synthesis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 31(2), 115-123) So we need SCE to identify these motivations and stuff. 13 + 14 + 11 11 **More explanation:** 12 12 13 13 //SCE// ... ... @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ 29 29 ** Stakeholder involvement in design and test activities 30 30 ** Producing re-usable design specifications and implementations 31 31 36 + 32 32 //HYBRID INTELLIGENCE GROWS BY...// 33 33 34 34 * Integrating technology into the situated practice via co-design by joint task performance and co-learning: ... ... @@ -41,29 +41,25 @@ 41 41 ** Collaboration patterns 42 42 ** Value models 43 43 49 + 50 + 44 44 //What is Human Centred design?// 45 45 46 -* Usability 53 +* **Usability** 47 47 ** extent to which a system, product or service can be used by specified users to achieve specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction in a specified context of use 48 -* Effectiveness 55 +* **Effectiveness** 49 49 ** accuracy and completeness with which users achieve specified goals 50 -* Efficiency 57 +* **Efficiency** 51 51 ** resources expended in relation to the accuracy and completeness with which users achieve goals 52 -* Satisfaction 59 +* **Satisfaction** 53 53 ** freedom from discomfort and positive attitudes towards the use of the product 54 -* Context of use 61 +* **Context of use** 55 55 ** users, tasks, equipment (hardware, software and materials), and the physical and social environments in which a product is used 56 -* User experience 63 +* **User experience** 57 57 ** person's perceptions and responses resulting from the use and/or anticipated use of a product, system or service 58 -* Stakeholder 65 +* **Stakeholder** 59 59 ** individual or organization having a right, share, claim or interest in a system or in its possession of characteristics that meet their needs and expectations 60 60 61 61 62 62 63 -= **//References//** = 64 - 65 -[1] Week 3.1a slide 27. 66 - 67 -[2] Han, A., Radel, J., McDowd, J. M., & Sabata, D. (2016). Perspectives of people with dementia about meaningful activities: a synthesis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 31(2), 115-123) 68 - 69 69