Last modified by Rixt Hellinga on 2024/04/08 18:40

From version 11.1
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/02/29 16:29
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 6.1
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/02/29 15:41
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,19 +1,24 @@
1 -The issue at hand, as discussed in previous chapters, requires a combination of human and robot solutions. To design and develop such a solution we can use the Socio-Cognitive Engineering (SCE) method. SCE provides a clear structure, consisting of a foundation, specification, and evaluation. It allows us to take into account stakeholders and their values, and create claims through functions, effects, and use cases. The incremental and iterative process taken in the SCE method combines human factors and related technology to form re-usable solutions.
1 +The issue at hand, as discussed in previous chapters, requires a combination of human and robot solutions. To design and develop such a solution we can use the Socio-Cognitive Engineering (SCE) framework. SCE provides an iterative and incremental
2 2  
3 -Generally, technology does not work in isolation (1). In the context of our problem, the robot's environment, knowledge, and goals are intertwined with that of the human. SCE allows us to combine the human and technological aspects or our problem. According to (2) it is important to map the underlying motivation of parties in order to understand which activities they would be drawn to. Each of the involved parties (the robot, the subject, the guardian) can be modeled through the SCE method. Through methods such as user stories and value stories we can create a well-rounded description of a stakeholder and their goals. The difference in for example environments, abilities, and goals are easy to map out through SCE.
3 +what is it -> see description
4 4  
5 -**TODO:** a little more on hybrid intelligence. a little more on why sce is useful for us
5 +why do we need it -> because robots are not in isolation
6 6  
7 7  
8 -(1) Source: Week 3.1a slide 27.
9 -
10 -(2) "Identifying the underlying motivation for an individual with dementia to engage in different activities is important for matching a person with activities that will be satisfying." (Han, A., Radel, J., McDowd, J. M., & Sabata, D. (2016). Perspectives of people with dementia about meaningful activities: a synthesis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 31(2), 115-123) So we need SCE to identify these motivations and stuff.
11 -
12 12  **Questions to answer here:**
13 13  
14 14  * Why do we use Socio-Cognitive Engineering? What are its aspect/perks and why is that applicable in our case?
15 15  * "How can the technology be designed such that the human is able to work with the technology?" - xwiki
16 16  
13 +**Short answer:**
14 +
15 +We need an agent that takes care of some of the needs of Pwds. We cannot see these people outside of their environment and have to integrate that into our solution. so we need sce.
16 +
17 +AI does not work in isolation. We have to integrate technology into human's work and living environment. Source: Week 3.1a slide 27. This Hybrid intelligence is situated (source slide 28). It's a combination of the agent, the human, and their environment, each of which practice self-regulation.
18 +
19 +"Identifying the underlying motivation for an individual with dementia to engage in different activities is important for matching a person with activities that will be satisfying." (Han, A., Radel, J., McDowd, J. M., & Sabata, D. (2016). Perspectives of people with dementia about meaningful activities: a synthesis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 31(2), 115-123) So we need SCE to identify these motivations and stuff.
20 +
21 +
17 17  **More explanation:**
18 18  
19 19  //SCE//
... ... @@ -47,21 +47,23 @@
47 47  ** Collaboration patterns
48 48  ** Value models
49 49  
55 +
50 50  //What is Human Centred design?//
51 51  
52 -* Usability
58 +* **Usability**
53 53  ** extent to which a system, product or service can be used by specified users to achieve specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction in a specified context of use
54 -* Effectiveness
60 +* **Effectiveness**
55 55  ** accuracy and completeness with which users achieve specified goals
56 -* Efficiency
62 +* **Efficiency**
57 57  ** resources expended in relation to the accuracy and completeness with which users achieve goals
58 -* Satisfaction
64 +* **Satisfaction**
59 59  ** freedom from discomfort and positive attitudes towards the use of the product
60 -* Context of use
66 +* **Context of use**
61 61  ** users, tasks, equipment (hardware, software and materials), and the physical and social environments in which a product is used
62 -* User experience
68 +* **User experience**
63 63  ** person's perceptions and responses resulting from the use and/or anticipated use of a product, system or service
64 -* Stakeholder
70 +* **Stakeholder**
65 65  ** individual or organization having a right, share, claim or interest in a system or in its possession of characteristics that meet their needs and expectations
66 66  
73 +
67 67