Changes for page 2. Socio-Cognitive Engineering

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -1,67 +1,51 @@
1		-The issue at hand, as discussed in previous chapters, requires a combination of human and robot solutions. To design and develop such a solution we can use the Socio-Cognitive Engineering (SCE) method. SCE provides a clear structure, consisting of a foundation, specification, and evaluation. It allows us to take into account stakeholders and their values, and create claims through functions, effects, and use cases. The incremental and iterative process taken in the SCE method combines human factors and related technology to form re-usable solutions.
	1	+* Why do we use Socio-Cognitive Engineering? What are its aspect/perks and why is that applicable in our case?
2	2
3		-Generally, technology does not work in isolation (1). In the context of our problem, the robot's environment, knowledge, and goals are intertwined with that of the human. SCE allows us to combine the human and technological aspects or our problem. According to (2) it is important to map the underlying motivation of parties in order to understand which activities they would be drawn to. Each of the involved parties (the robot, the subject, the guardian) can be modeled through the SCE method. Through methods such as user stories and value stories we can create a well-rounded description of a stakeholder and their goals. The difference in for example environments, abilities, and goals are easy to map out through SCE.
	3	+**SCE**
4	4
5		-**TODO:** a little more on hybrid intelligence. a little more on why sce is useful for us
	5	+AI does not work in isolation. We have to integrate technology into human's work and living environment. Source: Week 3.1a slide 27. This Hybrid intelligence is situated (source slide 28). It's a combination of the agent, the human, and their environment, each of which practice self-regulation.
6	6
	7	+It considers multiple stakeholders and their values.
7	7
8		-(1) Source: Week 3.1a slide 27.
	9	+We can use the following as a design pattern?
9	9
10		-(2) "Identifying the underlying motivation for an individual with dementia to engage in different activities is important for matching a person with activities that will be satisfying." (Han, A., Radel, J., McDowd, J. M., & Sabata, D. (2016). Perspectives of people with dementia about meaningful activities: a synthesis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 31(2), 115-123) So we need SCE to identify these motivations and stuff.
	11	+Basic Human Values Value Sensitive Design Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 11.
11	11
12		-**Questions to answer here:**
13	13
14		-* Why do we use Socio-Cognitive Engineering? What are its aspect/perks and why is that applicable in our case?
15		-* "How can the technology be designed such that the human is able to work with the technology?" - xwiki
	14	+We need an agent that takes care of some of the needs of Pwds. We cannot see these people outside of their environment and have to integrate that into our solution. so we need sce.
16	16
17		-**More explanation:**
18	18
19		-//SCE//
20	20
21		-* It provides a structure to work in (see the foundation, specification, evaluation image).
22		-* It considers multiple stakeholders and their values.
23		-* It uses user stories and value stories.
24		-* It is incremental and iterative. (**Cyclic Process of Progression: **Source: after Carroll (2002), Figure 3.1, p. 68.)
25		-* It uses ontologies and design patterns.
26		-* It uses personas and problem scenarios, and scenario-based design.
27		-* It uses use cases, functions, effects, and claims in the specification
28		-* It is: (source Week 3.2b - SCEmodule2b_ScenarioBasedDesign2024 slide 4)
29		-** Iterative incremental process
30		-*** Quick start
31		-*** Focused refinement of core functions and design rationale
32		-*** Coherent specification
33		-** Theory and empirical driven
34		-** Combined operational (domain), human factors and technology perspective
35		-** Stakeholder involvement in design and test activities
36		-** Producing re-usable design specifications and implementations
	18	+What is Human Centred design?
37	37
38		-//HYBRID INTELLIGENCE GROWS BY...//
	20	+**Usability**
	21	+extent to which a system, product or service can
	22	+be used by specified users to achieve specified
	23	+goals with effectiveness, efficiency and
	24	+satisfaction in a specified context of use
	25	+**Effectiveness**
	26	+accuracy and completeness with which users
	27	+achieve specified goals
	28	+**Efficiency**
	29	+resources expended in relation to the accuracy
	30	+and completeness with which users achieve
	31	+goals
	32	+**Satisfaction**
	33	+freedom from discomfort and positive attitudes
	34	+towards the use of the product
	35	+**Context of use**
	36	+users, tasks, equipment (hardware, software and
	37	+materials), and the physical and social
	38	+environments in which a product is used
	39	+**User experience**
	40	+person's perceptions and responses resulting from
	41	+the use and/or anticipated use of a product, system
	42	+or service
	43	+**Stakeholder**
	44	+individual or organization having a right, share,
	45	+claim or interest in a system or in its possession of
	46	+characteristics that meet their needs and
	47	+expectations
39	39
40		-* Integrating technology into the situated practice via co-design by joint task performance and co-learning:
41		-** Common situated objectives
42		-** Value-sensitive agreements
43		-** Shared knowledge base & experiences
44		-** Mutual uptake & learning by explanation & feedback
45		-* and is grounded by
46		-** Ontologies of the partnership
47		-** Collaboration patterns
48		-** Value models
49	49
50		-//What is Human Centred design?//
51	51
52		-* Usability
53		-** extent to which a system, product or service can be used by specified users to achieve specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction in a specified context of use
54		-* Effectiveness
55		-** accuracy and completeness with which users achieve specified goals
56		-* Efficiency
57		-** resources expended in relation to the accuracy and completeness with which users achieve goals
58		-* Satisfaction
59		-** freedom from discomfort and positive attitudes towards the use of the product
60		-* Context of use
61		-** users, tasks, equipment (hardware, software and materials), and the physical and social environments in which a product is used
62		-* User experience
63		-** person's perceptions and responses resulting from the use and/or anticipated use of a product, system or service
64		-* Stakeholder
65		-** individual or organization having a right, share, claim or interest in a system or in its possession of characteristics that meet their needs and expectations
66		-
67		-
	51	+**Cyclic Process of Progression: **Source: after Carroll (2002), Figure 3.1, p. 68.