Skip to Content
Last modified by Rixt Hellinga on 2024/04/08 18:40
From version 11.1
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/02/29 16:29
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 15.2
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/03/19 22:53
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,67 +1,23 @@
1 -The issue at hand, as discussed in previous chapters, requires a combination of human and robot solutions. To design and develop such a solution we can use the Socio-Cognitive Engineering (SCE) method. SCE provides a clear structure, consisting of a foundation, specification, and evaluation. It allows us to take into account stakeholders and their values, and create claims through functions, effects, and use cases. The incremental and iterative process taken in the SCE method combines human factors and related technology to form re-usable solutions.
1 +The issue at hand, as discussed in previous chapters, requires a combination of human and robot solutions. To design and develop such a solution we can use the Socio-Cognitive Engineering (SCE) method. SCE is a framework that among other things promotes human collaboration and learning with technology-based systems [3].
2 2  
3 -Generally, technology does not work in isolation (1). In the context of our problem, the robot's environment, knowledge, and goals are intertwined with that of the human. SCE allows us to combine the human and technological aspects or our problem. According to (2) it is important to map the underlying motivation of parties in order to understand which activities they would be drawn to. Each of the involved parties (the robot, the subject, the guardian) can be modeled through the SCE method. Through methods such as user stories and value stories we can create a well-rounded description of a stakeholder and their goals. The difference in for example environments, abilities, and goals are easy to map out through SCE.
3 +It provides a clear structure, consisting of a foundation, specification, and evaluation. It allows us to take into account stakeholders and their values, and create claims through functions, effects, and use cases. The incremental and iterative process taken in the SCE method combines human factors and related technology to form re-usable solutions.
4 4  
5 -**TODO:** a little more on hybrid intelligence. a little more on why sce is useful for us
5 +Generally, technology does not work in isolation [1]. In the context of our problem, the robot's environment, knowledge, and goals are intertwined with that of the human. SCE allows us to combine the human and technological aspects or our problem. Within different fields of studies we can find relevant philosophies and approaches applicable to our problem.
6 6  
7 +According to [2] it is important to map the underlying motivation of parties in order to understand which activities they would be drawn to. Each of the involved parties (the robot, the PwD, the guardian) can be modeled through the SCE method. Through methods such as user stories and value stories we can create a well-rounded description of a stakeholder and their goals. --The difference in for example environments, abilities, and goals are easy to map out through SCE.--
7 7  
8 -(1) Source: Week 3.1a slide 27.
9 +//Computer science//
9 9  
10 -(2) "Identifying the underlying motivation for an individual with dementia to engage in different activities is important for matching a person with activities that will be satisfying." (Han, A., Radel, J., McDowd, J. M., & Sabata, D. (2016). Perspectives of people with dementia about meaningful activities: a synthesis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 31(2), 115-123) So we need SCE to identify these motivations and stuff.
11 +//Cognitive science//
11 11  
12 -**Questions to answer here:**
13 +//User centerd design//
13 13  
14 -* Why do we use Socio-Cognitive Engineering? What are its aspect/perks and why is that applicable in our case?
15 -* "How can the technology be designed such that the human is able to work with the technology?" - xwiki
15 +[[https:~~/~~/www.researchgate.net/publication/32231480_Socio-cognitive_Engineering>>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/32231480_Socio-cognitive_Engineering]] [3]
16 16  
17 -**More explanation:**
17 += **//References//** =
18 18  
19 -//SCE//
19 +[1] Week 3.1a slide 27.
20 20  
21 -* It provides a structure to work in (see the foundation, specification, evaluation image).
22 -* It considers multiple stakeholders and their values.
23 -* It uses user stories and value stories.
24 -* It is incremental and iterative. (**Cyclic Process of Progression: **Source: after Carroll (2002), Figure 3.1, p. 68.)
25 -* It uses ontologies and design patterns.
26 -* It uses personas and problem scenarios, and scenario-based design.
27 -* It uses use cases, functions, effects, and claims in the specification
28 -* It is: (source Week 3.2b - SCEmodule2b_ScenarioBasedDesign2024 slide 4)
29 -** Iterative incremental process
30 -*** Quick start
31 -*** Focused refinement of core functions and design rationale
32 -*** Coherent specification
33 -** Theory and empirical driven
34 -** Combined operational (domain), human factors and technology perspective
35 -** Stakeholder involvement in design and test activities
36 -** Producing re-usable design specifications and implementations
21 +[2] Han, A., Radel, J., McDowd, J. M., & Sabata, D. (2016). Perspectives of people with dementia about meaningful activities: a synthesis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 31(2), 115-123)
37 37  
38 -//HYBRID INTELLIGENCE GROWS BY...//
39 -
40 -* Integrating technology into the situated practice via co-design by joint task performance and co-learning:
41 -** Common situated objectives
42 -** Value-sensitive agreements
43 -** Shared knowledge base & experiences
44 -** Mutual uptake & learning by explanation & feedback
45 -* and is grounded by
46 -** Ontologies of the partnership
47 -** Collaboration patterns
48 -** Value models
49 -
50 -//What is Human Centred design?//
51 -
52 -* Usability
53 -** extent to which a system, product or service can be used by specified users to achieve specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction in a specified context of use
54 -* Effectiveness
55 -** accuracy and completeness with which users achieve specified goals
56 -* Efficiency
57 -** resources expended in relation to the accuracy and completeness with which users achieve goals
58 -* Satisfaction
59 -** freedom from discomfort and positive attitudes towards the use of the product
60 -* Context of use
61 -** users, tasks, equipment (hardware, software and materials), and the physical and social environments in which a product is used
62 -* User experience
63 -** person's perceptions and responses resulting from the use and/or anticipated use of a product, system or service
64 -* Stakeholder
65 -** individual or organization having a right, share, claim or interest in a system or in its possession of characteristics that meet their needs and expectations
66 -
67 67  
XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +xwiki:XWiki.MarkNeerincx
Comment
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Maybe you can add something on the integration of disciplines and distributed R&D activities?
Date
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2024-03-18 15:53:47.866